Search Supreme Court Cases

Carr v. United States 560 U. S. ____ - 08-1301 (2010)

Syllabus (pdf)
Opinion [ Justice Sotomayor ] (pdf)
Concurrence [ Justice Scalia ] (pdf)
Dissent [ Justice Alito ] (pdf)

560 U. S. ____ (2010)
560 U. S. ____ (2010)
560 U. S. ____ (2010)
NO. 08-1301


on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit

[June 1, 2010]

   Justice Scalia, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.

   I join the Court’s opinion except for Part III–C. I do not join that part because only the text Congress voted on, and not unapproved statements made or comments written during its drafting and enactment process, is an authoritative indicator of the law. But even if those preenactment materials were relevant, it would be unnecessary to address them here. The Court’s thorough discussion of text, context, and structure, ante, at 5–17, demonstrates that the meaning of 18 U. S. C. §2250(a) is plain. As the Court acknowledges, ante, at 18, but does not heed, we must not say more:

“We have stated time and again that courts must presume that a legislature says in a statute what it means and means in a statute what it says there. When the words of a statute are unambiguous, then, this first canon is also the last: judicial inquiry is complete.” Connecticut Nat. Bank v. Germain, 503 U. S. 249, 253–254 (1992) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).

Powered by Justia US Supreme Court Center: Carr v. United States 560 U. S. ____ - 08-1301 (2010)

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.