Search Supreme Court Cases

Giles v. California 554 U. S. ____ - 07-6053 (2008)

Syllabus (pdf)
Opinion [ Justice Scalia ] (pdf)
Concurrence [ Justice Thomas ] (pdf)
Concurrence [ Justice Alito ] (pdf)
Concurrence [ Justice Souter ] (pdf)
Dissent [ Justice Breyer ] (pdf)

554 U. S. ____ (2008)
554 U. S. ____ (2008)
554 U. S. ____ (2008)
NO. 07-6053


on writ of certiorari to the supreme court of california

[June 25, 2008]

   Justice Alito, concurring.

   I join the Court’s opinion, but I write separately to make clear that, like Justice Thomas, I am not convinced that the out-of-court statement at issue here fell within the Confrontation Clause in the first place. The dissent’s displeasure with the result in this case is understandable, but I suggest that the real problem concerns the scope of the confrontation right. The Confrontation Clause does not apply to out-of-court statements unless it can be said that they are the equivalent of statements made at trial by “witnesses.” U. S. Const., Amdt. 6. It is not at all clear that Ms. Avie’s statement falls within that category. But the question whether Ms. Avie’s statement falls within the scope of the Clause is not before us, and assuming for the sake of argument that the statement falls within the Clause, I agree with the Court’s analysis of the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing.

Powered by Justia US Supreme Court Center: Giles v. California 554 U. S. ____ - 07-6053 (2008)

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.