Search Supreme Court Cases

HILDEBURN V. TURNER, 46 U. S. 69 (1847)

U.S. Supreme Court

Hildeburn v. Turner, 46 U.S. 5 How. 69 69 (1847)

Hildeburn v. Turner

46 U.S. (5 How.) 69


When a bill of exchange is made payable at a bank, and the bank itself is the holder of the bill, it is a sufficient demand if the notary presents it at the bank and demands payment.

If, therefore, the protest states this and also that the notary was answered that it could not be paid, it is sufficient. It is not necessary for him to give the name of the person or officer of the bank to whom it was presented, and by whom he was answered.

The point of difference is fully set forth in the opinion of the Court.

Page 46 U. S. 70

Powered by Justia US Supreme Court Center: HILDEBURN V. TURNER, 46 U. S. 69 (1847)

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.