Search Supreme Court Cases
MICHOUD V. GIROD, 45 U. S. 503 (1846)
U.S. Supreme Court
Michoud v. Girod, 45 U.S. 4 How. 503 503 (1846)
Michoud v. Girod
45 U.S. (4 How.) 503
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
A person cannot legally purchase on his own account that which his duty or trust requires him to sell on account of another, nor purchase on account of another that which he sells on his own account. He is not allowed to unite the two opposite characters of buyer and seller.
A purchase, per interpositam personam, by a trustee or agent, of the particular property of which he has the sale, or in which he represents another, whether he has an interest in it or not, carries fraud on the face of it.
This rule applies to a purchase by executors at open sale, although they were empowered by the will to sell the estate of their testator for the benefit of heirs and legatees, a part of which heirs and legatees they themselves were.
A purchase so made by executors will be set aside.
The decisions of the courts of several states upon this subject examined and remarked upon.
Relaxations of this rule of the civil law, which were made in some countries of Europe, were not adopted by the Spanish law, and of course never reached Louisiana. Nor were those relaxations carried so far as to allow a testamentary or dative executor to buy the property which he was appointed to administer.
The maxims and qualifications of the civil law, upon this point, examined.
Although courts of equity generally adopt the statutes of limitation, yet, in a case of actual fraud, they will grant relief within the lifetime of either of the parties upon whom the fraud is proved, or within thirty years after it has been discovered or become known to the party whose rights are affected by it.
Within what time a constructive trust will be barred must depend upon the circumstances of the case, and these are always examinable.
Acquittances given to an executor, without a full knowledge of all the circumstances, where such information had been withheld by the executor, and mutates and promises thrown out to prevent inquiry, are not binding.
The widow Pargoud and others, defendants in this Court, were complainants in the court below, and obtained a decree in their favor, from which the other parties appealed. They alleged that a series of fraudulent transactions occurred, commencing in 1813, by which they had been deprived of their fair share of the estate of Clause Francois Girod, whose heirs they were, and that the chief agent in this fraud was Nicholas Girod, a brother of the deceased Claude Francois Girod, and also a brother of some of the complainants, and relative of the rest.
Claude Francois Girod was a resident of the Parish of Assumption, in the State of Louisiana, and died in the month of November, 1813, leaving a last will and testament, dated on 30 November, 1812, and a codicil, dated on 4 November, 1813, which will was admitted to probate, with the codicil, on 8 November, 1813. He never was married, and left eight brothers and sisters, and the children of a predeceased sister. These surviving brothers and sisters, with the exception of Jacques, otherwise called Jacques Antoine Girod (who was excluded by the terms of the will), were the legal heirs of the deceased Claude Francois Girod, each for the one-eighth part of his estate and the succession, and the heirs and legal representatives of the said predeceased sister, the legal heirs by representation of their deceased mother, for the remaining eighth part of the estate.
The proceedings in the case were exceedingly complicated. There was a bill, and an amended bill, and a supplemental bill, and another amended bill, and then another amended bill. Instead of pursuing the case through all these details, the simplest course will be to state the charges in the bill, and the documents brought forward to sustain them.
The will of Claude Francois Girod was as follows:
"I, Claude Francois Girod, the legitimate son of Francois Silvestre Girod, deceased, and of the late Francois, born Dubois, native of Thone, in Savoy, diocese of Geneva, province of France, and now a resident of the Parish of Assumption, on Bayou Lafourche, in the State of Louisiana, being about sixty years of age, and desirous to die in the Roman Catholic and Apostolic religion, under which I have ever lived, with a firm belief in the mysteries of our holy religion, do ordain this my last will or testament, in case I should be overtaken by death, the hour of which I am uncertain of, and as it behooves all living beings to settle their temporal affairs, when they are in the full enjoyment of their health and reason, in order to avoid thereby the difficulties which arise when we are laboring under a dangerous disease, which takes from us the use of our reasonable faculties, and consequently deprives us of the
understanding and memory necessary to the faithful and peaceable settlement of our family affairs, with a view to avert from our heirs the difficulties always prejudicial to those that are absent. Now therefore, under these circumstances, I invoke the grace and clemency of God, to whom I recommend my soul when separated from my body; and I wish and ordain, that the latter be buried among faithful Christians, with all the usual rites of our mother church, leaving with my testamentary executors, herein after named, the performance of all pious works, such as causing three masses to be said on my behalf to my holy patron, as also funeral services, masses, &c."
"1. I declare that the property I am now possessed of are the earnings of my labor and savings, and consist of the following items, to-wit, three houses and several lots situated in suburb St. Mary, above the City of New Orleans, and one in Chartres Street, now occupied by my brother, Nicolas Girod; one main plantation, whereon I reside, situated in said Bayou Lafourche, with all the buildings, improvements, and appurtenances thereof, and being thirty-one and a half arpents front, together with the utensils, implements of husbandry, animals of all kind, and one hundred and odd slaves of different ages belonging to me; also, a quantity of lands situated in the different parishes of the bayou, the titles to which I hold in my possession; also, a certain sum of money is due to me, which I cannot ascertain at present, but which will be made to appear by the books and obligations in my power; also, I am the owner of upwards of two hundred and seventy bales of ginned cotton, now in my stores; also, I declare that I am indebted unto divers persons by obligations, and little by accounts, in a sum of about thirty thousand dollars."
"3. I give and bequeath to my parish of Thone, in Savoy, to have a solemn mass annually said on my behalf, and to contribute to the repairs of said church, a sum of two thousand dollars, such being my will."
"4. I give to the poor of my said parish, to be distributed among them so as to meet their most pressing wants, a sum of one thousand dollars, such being my will."
"5. I give and bequeath to the cousins, Dodos Gollie, of said parish, a sum of five hundred dollars, such being my will."
"6. I give and bequeath to the brothers and sisters, Joseph Suard, Sr., and Antoine Suard, Jr., sons of Antonine Suard, deceased, since about thirty years, residing at Cluse, in Fonsigny (Savoy), the sum of two thousand dollars, such being my will."
"7. I give and bequeath to my distant relations of said parish a sum of five hundred dollars, to be distributed among them, such being my will."
"8. I give and bequeath to the Charity Hospital of Thone, in Savoy, a sum of one thousand dollars, such being my will. "
"9. I give and bequeath to the children of my deceased sister, Francoise, wife of Poidebard, without prejudicing their rights in and to my succession, the sum of two thousand dollars, to be divided between them by equal portions, such being my will."
"10. I give and bequeath to my sister Teresa, wife of Quetant, without prejudice to her rights in my succession, a sum of one thousand dollars, such being my will."
"11. I give and bequeath to my god-daughter and sister, Rosalie, married at Taloire, her husband's name being unknown to me, a sum of one thousand dollars, without prejudice to her rights in my succession, such being my will."
"12. I give for once to my brother James Girod, a sum of four thousand dollars, without any other rights or pretensions whatever in and to my succession, such being my last will."
"13. I give and bequeath to my brother Claude, married, the sum of two thousand dollars, without prejudice to his rights in my succession, such being my last will."
"14. I give and bequeath to the Parish of Assumption, for the church wardens in Lafourche, where I now reside, a sum of five hundred dollars, for contributing to the construction of a church, such being my will."
"15. I give and bequeath to the mulatress Francoise Vils, for the faithful services she has rendered to me at my house, during a long space of time, a sum of six thousand dollars, which shall be paid to her (after my death) one, two, and three years, such being my will."
"16. I give and bequeath to my god-daughter Francoise, a free colored woman, the daughter of Rosette, a negro woman, a sum of fifteen hundred dollars, such being my last will."
"17. I give and bequeath to the mulatress Belanie, wife of Colas Meillen, a sum of two hundred dollars, such being my will."
"18. I give likewise to her younger sister Polline, a sum of two hundred dollars, such being my will."
"19. I give and bequeath to my mulatto slave Dominic, who is a blacksmith and rum distiller, his freedom, which he shall be put in possession of six months after my death, for his good and faithful services to me."
"20. I nominate for my testamentary executors the following persons, my brother Nicolas, who is my senior, and Jean Francois, my junior, the former being a merchant in New Orleans, and the second is a planter, residing at Washita, and in their default, Mr. Phillipon Sr. merchant at New Orleans, to whom I give, by the present olographic testament, full power and authority as required by law to take possession of all my property present and to come, to inventory, sell, and cause them to be sold, as to him will seem best for the heirs of all my brothers and sisters, present and absent, without intervention of justice, hereby annulling and declaring
void all other testaments, codicils, and donations, mortis causa, and other acts of last will which I may have made previous to and to the prejudice of the present, which is the only one I adopt as being my last will, in order that my heirs may inherit and enjoy my property with the benediction of God and mine &c."
"Done and passed on my plantation, at Lafourche, 30 November, 1812."
"[Signed] C. F. GIROD"
"J'H COURRIE, witness"
"SAINT FELIX, witness"
"Ne varietur _____"
"STATE OF LOUISIANA, PARISH OF ASSUMPTION"
"Monday, November, in the year 1813"
"At the request of Mr. Nicolas Girod, I, F. Corvaisier, judge of this parish, did repair to the plantation of the late C. F. Girod, where a bundle written over having been presented to me as the testament or last will of the said C. F. Girod, signed by him under date of the thirtieth of November, eighteen hundred and twelve, as also an open codicil signed by the deceased, in the presence of Messrs. Prevot, St. Felix, and Francois Bernard de Deva, I proceeded to the proof of said testament by swearing to that effect Messrs. St. Felix and J'h Courrie, witnesses to said testament, in the presence of Mr. Nicolas Girod, and then proceeded to open the same."
"[Signed] N. GIROD"
"J. L. COURRIE"
"SAINT FELIX BECHE"
"Justice of the Peace"
"F. CORREJOLLES, witness"
"F. CORVAISIER, Judge"
"And by the opening of said testament we saw that Messrs. N'as Girod and F'ois Girod, brothers of the deceased, were appointed testamentary executors."
"[Signed] F. CORVAISIER, Judge"
There were four inventories made of the property of the deceased, namely:
November 12, 1813. In the Parish of Assumption.
February 3, 1814. In the Parish of Assumption.
February 18, 1814. In the Parish of Assumption.
February 26, 1814. In the City of New Orleans.
The amount of all these inventories was $124,594.45. In the fourth inventory was included the half of a house and lot at the corner of St. Louis and Chartres Streets in the City of New Orleans, whereas the complainants alleged that the whole of it belonged
to the deceased, and ought to have been included in the inventory.
The bill then charged, that the executors plotted and contrived to obtain possession, for their own use and benefit, and to the wrong and injury of their co-heirs, of the entire succession and estate of their deceased brother, by virtue of the following proceedings, which were charged with being illegal and fraudulent, namely:
On 19 January, 1814, the executors presented the following petition:
"To the Honorable Fran's Corvaisier, Judge of the Court of Probates of the Parish of Assumption, Lafourche."
"The petition of Nicholas and Jean Francois Girod, both merchants, residing in the State of Louisiana and testamentary executors of the late Claude Francois Girod, deceased, in the said parish, humbly showeth:"
"That their deceased brother, Claude Francois Girod, by his testament dated 30 November, 1812, has appointed them his testamentary executors and detainers of his estate, and as such given to them full power and authority to cause an inventory of all his property to be made, without intervention of justice, to sell or cause to be sold his property, in whole or in part, as to them will seem best for their own interests, and for those of the absent heirs named in said testament."
"Wherefore petitioners pray the Honorable Court to order, that the sale of the movables, movable effects, and of the main plantation, as also of the slaves of both sexes employed thereon, and other lands adjoining thereto, and making part thereof in the lifetime of the deceased, be made at public auction, for cash, as consisting in part of perishable objects, and for the purpose of paying the debts of the succession, after the usual delays, advertisements, and publications required by law."
"19 of January, 1814."
"[Signed] N. GIROD, Testamentary Executor"
"JN. FS. GIROD, Testamentary Executor"
On 16 February, 1814, the following bond was executed:
"Whereas the honorable judge, Francois Corvaisier, thinks that he is not authorized to sell the several properties situated in the Parish of Lafourche, interior, as being without the jurisdiction of his said parish, and whereas we are desirous to remove all the liabilities which the said honorable judge might subject himself to, by selling said lands in the same manner, and at the same time, as those situated within his jurisdiction. Now therefore, as testamentary
executors of the late C. F. Girod, we do bind ourselves by these presents to protect and warrant said honorable judge against all the troubles and difficulties which might be the consequence of his thus selling the lands of the succession situated out of this parish."
"In faith whereof we have signed these presents, to be by him used as of right. Parish of Assumption, the 16 February, 1814."
"[Signed] JN. FS. GIROD"
"JN. FS. GIROD, Executor"
On 18 February, 1814, a sale took place, as evidenced by the following paper:
"State of Louisiana, Parish of Assumption, the eighteenth day of February in the year 1814."
"On the day and year aforewritten, upon the request of the testamentary executors of the late C. F. Girod, I, Francois Corvaisier, judge of the said parish, did repair to the sugar plantation of the deceased, and we there proceeded to the sale and adjudication (as requested), of the property, both movable and immovable, belonging to the succession, to-wit:"
"[Then follows an enumeration of plantations, tracts of land, and personal property.]"
"N.B. A certain lot of ground situated at Donaldsonville, which, through error, was included in the original inventory, has not been sold, because it does not belong to the succession, but to one F'se Wiltz, a free woman of color. And the present sale being concluded on the day and year aforewritten, we have closed these presents, amounting to the total sum of eighty-four thousand seven hundred and fifty-five dollars and forty cents, omissions and errors of calculations excepted. And the witnesses, the last appraisers, and the parties interested, have signed, before the judge of the aforesaid Parish of Assumption, on the 18th of February, 1814."
"[Signed] JN. FS. GIROD"
"Testamentary Executor, for self, and by"
"procuration of his brother, N a's Girod"
"ETIENNE BOUDREAUY, witness."
"JACQUES TERIOT do."
"L. RICHE do."
"P. L. LAURET do."
"FS. CORREJOLES do."
"Ordinary mark of PIERRE CANCIEL do."
"JUAN VIVES do."
"J. BERN'DO DE DEVA do."
"Before me, F. CORVAISIER, Judge"
On the same day, namely, 18 February, 1814, the following judicial adjudication of the property was made, being in the nature of a deed:
"State of Louisiana, Parish of Assumption, 18 February, 1814"
"At the request of the testamentary executors of the late C. F. Girod, J. F. Corvaisier, judge of the aforesaid parish and of the court of probates, did repair to the sugar plantation of said deceased, where, the customary formalities being complied with, and the sale having been announced by the public crier, I proceeded, as requested, to sell at auction, and for cash, to the highest and last bidder, on account of said succession, or those interested therein, all the lands, slaves, and other property situated in this parish and county of Bayou Lafourche, to-wit: thirteen tracts of land or plantations, cultivated or otherwise, including thereon the sugar plantation [and] three small islands lying at the mouth of said bayou; also one hundred and seventeen slaves, employed on said sugar plantation, said slaves being of different ages and sexes, in good health, sick, infirm, crippled, and such as they are or may be, and no warranty being given to the purchaser against the redhibitory vices and maladies prescribed by law, said warranty being on the contrary absolutely and totally refused; also a cotton gin adjoining said sugar plantation; also a distillery in operation, with its implements and appurtenances; also all the horned cattle, mules, horses, carts, and wagons; also all the implements of husbandry of said sugar plantation; as also all the furniture [and] old silver plate; also twenty-two hundred gallons of Tafra, in the distillery aforesaid; also fifty-five thousand pounds of brown sugar lying on cisterns; also sixty-three bales of cotton (nine of which are damaged), weighing together twenty-three thousand one hundred and thirty pounds. All the above articles were sold separately, and cried by the public crier, with the exception of the sugar plantation, which was sold, with the furniture thereof, as appears by the judicial sale, detailed and deposited in the clerk's office of the said Parish of Assumption; and the whole, amounting together to the sum of eighty-four thousand seven hundred and fifty-five dollars and forty cents, was adjudicated for cash to Mr. Charles Saint Felix, who is satisfied therewith, for having seen, visited, received, and taken possession of same. And the aforesaid Nas. Girod and Jn. F. Girod, here present, declare, by the present act, that they have received from the said Charles Saint Felix the aforesaid sum of $84,755.40, for which acquittance is hereby given, and that they quitclaim and release him, and his heirs and assigns, of and from all claims and demands whatsoever."
"In testimony whereof, the aforesaid parties have signed the
present judicial sale, the day and year first above written, in presence of the undersigned witnesses, and of the parish judge."
"Signed, per procuration of Nas. Girod, JN. F. GIROD."
"JN. F. GIROD"
"Witnesses -- F. CORREJOLLEES."
"Before me, J. CORVAISIER, Judge"
On 23 February, 1814, by a similar deed to the above, Saint Felix conveyed the whole of the property to Nicholas Girod and Jean F. Girod, describing it in the language above quoted, and for the same consideration. The deed concludes in the following language:
"All which articles, the said Saint Feli does, by these presents, retrocede to the said purchasers, Nas. Girod and Jean Francois Girod, for themselves, their heirs and assigns, without any reservation or reclamation whatever, for the price and sum of eighty-four thousand seven hundred and fifty-five dollars and forty cents, which the said vendor acknowledges, by these presents, to have received, in ready money, from the said purchasers, Nas. Girod and Jean Frs. Girod, and for which the present sale will operate as an acquittal and release against all and every person or persons whatever; the said Saint Felix herein declaring, that he is not bound to furnish the said purchasers with any other titles for the said lands and slaves, than those which have been given and delivered to him at the judicial sale aforesaid, and which he now delivers to said purchasers, who acknowledge to have received them, and to be satisfied therewith. Wherefore, the contracting parties agreeing both to these presents, have set their names to the same, the day and year aforewritten, in the presence of the undersigned witnesses, and of the parish judge aforesaid."
"[Signed] NAS. GIROD, per procuration"
"JN. F. GIROD"
"JN. F. GIROD"
"Witness -- [Signed] J. COURRIE"
On 4 March, 1814, the following petition was presented, and order given for the sale of the property in New Orleans.
"To the Honorable James Pitot, Judge of the Court of Probates, the petition of Nicolas and Jean Francois Girod, testamentary executors of the late Claude Francois Girod, humbly showeth: "
"That in conformity with the order rendered by this honorable
court, they have caused an inventory to be made by the register of said court of all the property left by the deceased in this parish, and amounting, according to the appraisement made thereof, to the sum of twenty thousand seven hundred dollars, being the amount of eight lots, and a piece of ground, situated in this city, at the corner of St. Louis and Chartres Streets, as the whole appears from said inventory deposited in the clerk's office of said court. Petitioners further show that the succession of their late brother Claude Francois Girod is indebted in a sum of sixty thousand dollars or thereabouts, being the amount of the legacies and debts left by the deceased, which it is necessary to pay without delay. Wherefore petitioners pray this Honorable Court to order that the said piece of ground and eight lots be sold for cash, as also the said house, which, belonging in common to the succession and one of the petitioners, cannot be conveniently divided without loss or inconvenience to the owners, and petitioners further pray that the present petition be served upon the attorney appointed to represent the absent heirs, so that the law be complied with, and justice will be done."
"[Signed] N. GIROD, Mayor"
"Copied from the original in English."
"Let Mr. C. R. Caune, attorney appointed by the court to represent the absent heirs of said Claude Francois Girod, be notified to show cause why the prayer of this petition should not be granted."
"[Signed] JS. PITOT"
"New Orleans, March 3, 1814"
"As attorney representing the absent heirs of the said late Claude Francois Girod, I have no objections to the petitioners' demand."
"[Signed] R. CAUNE, Attorney for absent heirs"
"New Orleans, March 4, 1814"
"New Orleans, March 5, 1814."
"[Signed] JS. PITOT, Judge"
On 9 April, 1814, a sale was made of the property in the City of New Orleans, in conformity with the above order, which was inventoried on 26 February, as appeared by the following paper.
"And on this ninth day of the month of April, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fourteen, and of the
independence of the United States of America the thirty-eighth, at the hour of ten A.M., I, Jean Baptiste Marc Brierre, deputy register of wills for the City and Parish of New Orleans, did repair to suburb Saint Mary for the purpose of selling to the highest and last bidder the houses and lots belonging to the succession of the late Claude Francois Girod, and there being, we did find and meet with Mr. Nicolas Girod, one of the testamentary executors of the deceased, and Charles Robert Caune, attorney at law, appointed by the court to represent the absent heirs. Whereupon, in their presence, and in that of Prosper Prieur and Sebastian Blondeau, witnesses hereto required, I did proclaim the said sale in a loud and audible voice, and on the following terms and conditions, to-wit:"
"[The paper then enumerated the lots of ground, and concluded as follows:]"
"And there remaining nothing else to be sold belonging to said succession, I, deputy register, aforesaid, closed and terminated the present process verbal. And after reading thereof, we ascertained the amount of said sale to be twenty-seven thousand seven hundred dollars, which sum was left by us in the hands of the said Nicolas Girod, testamentary executor aforesaid, who acknowledges the same, takes charge thereof, and has signed with the parties, the witnesses, and me, deputy register, the day, month, and year aforewritten."
"R. CAUNE, Attorney"
"N. GIROD, Testamentary Executor"
"BRIERRE, Deputy Register"
On 28 April, 1814, Laignel conveyed to Nicholas Girod, as follows.
"Sale of House and Lots from Simon Laignel to Nicholas Girod"
"Before me, Michel de Armas, a notary public residing in New Orleans, State of Louisiana, United States of America, and in the presence of the witnesses hereinafter named and undersigned, personally appeared Mr. Simon Laignel, merchant, residing in suburb St. Mary, who has, by these presents, sold, transferred, and conveyed, from this day and forever, with no other warranty than that of his own acts and deeds, unto Mr. Nicolas Girod, of this city, merchant, here present and accepting purchaser for himself, his heirs and assigns."
"1st. Six lots of ground," &c., enumerating the lots, and concluding as follows:
"To have and to hold said property
unto the said purchaser, who may use, enjoy, and dispose of the same, in full and complete ownership, by virtue hereof. The property herein sold and described belong to the vendor, for having acquired the same at the public sale which the said Nicolas Girod, as testamentary executor of the late Claude Francois Girod, caused to be made on 9 April, instant, by the register of wills, of the property belonging to said Claude Francois Girod's succession, as the whole appears by the act of sale confirmatory of the adjudication aforesaid, passed before the notary undersigned on the 25th instant. By the certificate of the recorder of mortgages in this city, bearing even date herewith, it appears that there is no mortgage in the name of the vendor on the property herein bargained and sold."
"The present sale is made for and in consideration of the total sum of thirty-five thousand eight hundred dollars, which the said vendor acknowledges to have received cash, before the signing hereof, and out of the presence of the notary and witnesses undersigned, from the purchaser, to whom he grants full and ample acquittance and release of the same, renouncing the benefit of the exception, non numerata pecunia, and the two years' delay which the law accords to enforce said exception. Thus it was &c., promising, obliging, renouncing &c."
"Done and passed at New Orleans, in my office, in the presence of Messrs. Michel J. B. L. Fourcesy and Charles Robert Caune, both witnesses hereto required and domiciled in this city on the twenty-eighth of April in the year eighteen hundred and fourteen, and of the independence of America the thirty-eighth; and the said appearers, notary, and witnesses, have signed these presents, after reading thereof."
"[Signed] N. GIROD"
"MICH'L DE ARMAS, Not. Pub."
The bill of the complainants in the court below also charged, that the executors, in order to appropriate, wickedly and fraudulently, to their own use and benefit, the funds of the succession, did, in their account of 23 May, 1817, place themselves as creditors of said succession for a sum of nearly forty-nine thousand dollars, to-wit, said Nicholas Girod for forty thousand four hundred and eighteen dollars and nine cents, and said Jean Francois Girod for eight thousand two hundred and fifty-three dollars and twenty cents, although no sum was due to them.
The proceedings upon which this charge was founded are as follows:
"STATE OF LOUISIANA: "
"v. No. 604 -- Parish court"
"J. F. GIROD, Executor of C. F."
"Girod, and R. C. Caune &c."
"Petition, filed November 26, 1814"
"To the Honorable James Pitot, Judge of the Parish Court for the Parish and City of New Orleans."
"The petition of Nicolas Girod, of the said city and parish, merchant, showeth, that Claude Francis Girod, of Lafourche, was indebted to your petitioner in a large sum of money previous to his decease; that thereto annexed is a detailed account of the money due by his estate, at this time, to your petitioner, which account, amounting to the sum of forty thousand five hundred and seventy-seven dollars and twenty cents, principal [and] interest, the executors of the said Claude F. Girod has refused to pay, though thereto frequently required. Wherefore your petitioner prays that John Francis Girod, now residing in the City of New Orleans aforesaid, one of the executors of the said Claude F. Girod, and R. C. Caune, the attorney appointed to represent the interest of the absent heirs, may be cited to appear and answer this petition."
"And your petitioner further prays, that they may be condemned to pay your petitioner the above sum of $40,577.20, with interest and costs."
"And your petitioner further prays all such other relief as the case may require, and to justice and equity many appertain."
"Received the annexed document, New Orleans, September 9, 1816."
"A copy thereof being annexed to the award of the arbitrators in the premises."
"Mr. J. F. Girod, Executor of C. F. Girod, and C. R. Caune: "
"You are hereby summoned to comply with the prayer of the annexed petition, or to file your answer thereto in writing with the clerk of the Parish of Orleans, at his office at New Orleans, in ten days after the service hereof, and if you fail herein, judgment will be given against you by default."
"Witness the Honorable James Pitot, judge of the said court, this 26 November, in the year of our Lord 181_."
"[Signed] SAM. P. MOORE, Deputy Clerk"
"Served a copy of petition and citation on each [of] the
defendants, November 28, 1814; returned November 28, 1814."
"J. H. HOLLAND, Deputy Sheriff"
"Answer of J. F. Girod, filed November 29, 1814"
"To the Honorable James Pitot, Judge of the Court for the Parish and City of New Orleans, the answer of Jean F. Girod, one of the testamentary executors of the late C. F. Girod, to the petition of Nicholas Girod, humbly showeth: "
"That all and singular the items in the accounts presented by said Nicholas Girod, in his said petition, must be proved, to justify his claim against the succession of C. F. Girod, and for that purpose this respondent prays this Honorable Court to order what shall seem the best for the common interest of parties, and moreover to be hence dismissed with costs. And &c."
"[Signed] J. F. GIROD, Ex., Jr."
"Answer of R. Caune, filed November 29, 1814"
"To the Honorable James Pitot, Judge of the Parish Court, the answer of C. R. Caune, in his capacity of attorney representing the absent heirs of the late C. F. Girod, to the petition presented by Nicholas Girod, against the estate of the late aforesaid C. F. Girod: "
"Your respondent denies all facts mentioned in the plaintiff's petition, and he says that the plaintiff must be proven his claim before court, and prays the court to dismiss him, with costs of the suit; in duty bound, your petitioner shall ever pray."
"[Signed] R. CAUNE, Attorney"
"Order appointing Arbitrators, Parish court for the Parish and"
"City of New Orleans, November 27, 1814"
"Present: the Honorable James Pitot."
"NICOLAS GIROD v. J. F. GIROD, Ex. of C. F. Girod, and C. R. Caune, attorney for the absent heirs."
"Upon motion of Alfred Hennen, esquire, of counsel for the plaintiff, it is ordered that F. Percy and F. M. Rouzan be appointed arbitrators in this case, to decide on the claim of the plaintiff, and in case of their not agreeing, that the court appoint a third person as umpire. I do hereby certify the above."
"In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court at the City of New Orleans, the day and year first above written, and of the independence of the United States the thirty-ninth."
"[Signed] SAM. P. MOORE, Deputy Clerk (swearing)"
"Personally appeared before me, one of the justices of the peace in and for the City and Parish of New Orleans, Ferdinand
Percy et F. M. Rouzan, of this city, who were duly sworn according to law as arbitrators as above named, that they will examine the accounts between the parties with impartiality, and give the report according to law."
"[Signed] F. MEFFER ROUZAN"
"F. PERCY, Jr."
"Subscribed and sworn to before me, at New Orleans, 10 December, 1814."
"[Signed] J. L. LAPANSE, Justice of the Peace"
"The undersigned arbitrators, appointed by a decree of the honorable the court of the City of New Orleans, under date of 25 November last, to verify and examine the accounts and demands of Nicolas Girod, a merchant residing in New Orleans, against the succession of the late Claude Francois Girod, his brother, who was a resident of the Parish of Lafourche, in this state, said succession being represented by Jean Francois Girod, one of the testamentary executors thereof, and C. R. Caune, attorney for the absent heirs, and to make a report thereon to said Honorable Court, do declare, under the sanctity of the oath they have taken, on the tenth of December instant, and which is hereto annexed, that after hearing the parties interested in this affair, and the witnesses by them introduced, after being sworn by John L. Laparge, a justice of the peace in this city, they have proceeded to the examination and verification of the documents, titles, accounts, and books exhibited to them by the parties interested in the manner following, to-wit: first, they have examined the sworn account produced by Nicolas Girod, on 25 November last, which consists of thirteen items, which the arbitrators have verified in the manner following."
The first item, amounting in capital to $ 1,602 for 801
hides, which the said Nicolas had left in the stores
of Claude Francois Girod, is established by the
declaration of Jean Francois Girod, who affirms
positively that the said 801 hides had been left in
the stores of said Claude Francois Girod, who disposed
of the same for his private account; the said Jean
Francois Girod declares likewise, that two dollars
was the price for hides in 1794, and that he himself
had purchased some at that price for his own account . . . $ 1,602.00
The second item, amounting in capital to $ 1,500, is
the produce of an account which Mr. Pierre Bousignes,
then clerk of the house of Claude F. Girod, had
collected and paid in the hands of said Claude F.
Girod, as making part of the funds
belonging to Nicolas Girod. Mr. Bousignes declared
under oath that he does not remember the precise amount
of that sum, but that it must have been something
like fifteen hundred dollars; he recollects that
that account was paid in before the fire of 1794,
and that several cash payments for the private
account of C. F. Girod were made out of the funds
belonging to said Nicolas Girod. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,500.00
The third item, amounting in capital to $ 6,222.18,
proceeds from the following remittances and effects,
to-wit : Jean Francois Girod paid in specie to
Claude Francois Girod, Nicolas Girod's interest,
say two-thirds in a shipment of furs made in March,
1795, on board the brig Jane, bound to Philadelphia,
and amounting to $ 3,593.37, as appears from a
copy book or register, marked A, No. 40, written by
Guilhempan, and signed by the said Claude Francois
Girod, which book or register has been produced
by the said Jean Francois Girod, who further
declared, that the said Claude Francois Girod was
at that time authorized to settle the accounts of
Nicolas Girod with this deponent, and that the said
C. F. Girod has never rendered to Nicolas Girod an
account of this transaction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,395.63
For so much paid by Jean Francois Girod to said Claude
Francois Girod, for Nicolas' interest, say two
thirds in another shipment of furs made in April,
1795, on board the brig L'Archedimoi, bound to
Philadelphia, as appears from the aforementioned
copy book or register, marked A, No. 40. . . . . . . . . . 432.75
For the amount of a barrel of wine, with which the
private account of said C. F. Girod was debited on
17 October, 1795, but never since credited
with, as appears from the aforementioned copy book
or register . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50.00
Amount of a bill of exchange drawn by Claude Francois
Girod, on the 7 April, 1796, payable eight
days after sight, at New York, to his brother,
Nicolas Girod, for $ 2,000, which he had received
from Jean Francois Girod, for $2,000, which he had
received from Jean Francois Girod; said bill has
never been accepted or paid, as appears from the
bill itself, which has been exhibited to us by said
Nicolas Girod. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,000.00
For the half of the amount of twenty-six barrels of
gunpowder, shipped in the month of April, 1796, on
board the ship The Two Friends, bound to New
York, and consigned to Th. Thebane, by Jean Francois
Girod, on joint account with Nicolas Girod. The
proceeds whereof, amounting to $ 1,193.75, as
appears from the copy book aforesaid, were received,
as also the profits of said Th. Thebane by the said
Claude Francois Girod, who never accounted for them
to the parties interested. This being established
by the declaration of said Jn. F. Girod. . . . . . . . . . $ 596.87
Amount of sundry merchandises belonging to Nicolas
Girod, and by Jean Francois Girod entrusted to
Claude Francois Girod, as appears from the
copy book aforesaid, which was exhibited to us by
said Jean Francois Girod, who declared that Claude
Francois Girod had never accounted for the
merchandise to said Nicolas Girod . . . . . . . . . . . . 210.06
Amount of sundry debts which Claude Francois Girod
had undertaken to collect for account of Nicolas
Girod, as appears from the statement produced by
Jean Francois Girod, and corroborated by the
aforesaid copy book or register A. . . . . . . . . . . . . 476.87
Amount of a barrel of wine, sold to Mr. de Vangine,
by the said Jn. Francois Girod, which was paid to
said Claude Francois Girod, as is proven by a
written declaration of said Jn. F. Girod in said
copy book or register. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60.00
The 4th item, amounting in capital to $ 186, is
established by the declaration of Jean Francois
Girod, who affirms that it is within his knowledge
that the articles composing said item were delivered
to Claude Francois Girod, who shipped them for
Havana on his private account. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186.00
The 5th item, amounting in capital to $ 651.50,
consists of the net proceeds of the sale made by
Claude Frs. Girod of 2 bales of blue drilling,
shipped for New York in 1801, on board of the ship
South Carolina, Stick, master, by Thibaut, for
account of Nicolas Girod, and consigned to Claude
F'ois Girod, as appears from book No. 1, which was
exhibited to the arbitrators, who ascertained that
it was in the handwriting of Guilhempan, then the
clerk and agent of C. F. Girod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 651.50
The 6th item, amounting in capital to $ 299.06,
consists likewise of the net proceeds of the sale
of a cask of manna, shipped by Nicolas Girod when in
New York, in 1797, on board of schooner Dispatch,
Clark, master, to the consignment of said Claude
Francois Girod, as the whole was made to appear
by copy book No. 1, mentioned in the foregoing
article . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 229.06
The 7th item, amounting in capital to $ 379.12,
consists of a lot of merchandise, consigned by
Jean Francois Girod to Claude Francois Girod, at
the time of said J'n F. Girod's departure for the
United States in 1797, which said merchandises
belonged to said Nicolas Girod, and were sold by
said Claude Francois Girod, as appears from a waste
or copy book, in the handwriting of said Guilhempan,
marked B, No. 42, and produced by said Jean Francois
Girod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379.12
The 8th item, amounting in capital to $ 813.82,
consists of the proceeds of the sale made by Claude
Frs. of divers merchandises belonging to Nicolas
Girod, which the latter had left in the hands of
Jean Francois Girod, who delivered them in kind to
Claude Francois Girod at the time of said J. F.
Girod's departure for the United States, in 1797;
said merchandises are enumerated in a copy or
waste book in the handwriting of the late
Guilhempan, marked B, No. 41, and likewise produced
by the parties interested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813.82
The 9th item, amounting in capital to $ 899, consists
of the net proceeds of twelve barrels of wine
shipped by Nicolas Girod when in New York, 1797,
on board the brig Success, Dinsmore, master, to the
consignment of Claude Francois Girod, who sold the
same, as was shown by the sales book No. 1,
aforesaid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899.00
The 10th item, amounting in capital to $489.63, consists
also of the net proceeds of sale made by Claude
F'ois Girod, of 498 sextains of cards shipped by
N'as Girod when in New York, in 1797, on board of
the brig Success, Rathbone, master, to the
consignment of said Claude F'ois Girod, as was shown
by the sales book No. 1, aforesaid. . . . . . . . . . . . 489.63
The 11th item, amounting in capital to $ 991.38,
consists also of the net proceeds of the sale made
by C. F. Girod of 762 sextains of cards, shipped in
1795 by Nicolas Girod, then in New York, for his
account and risks, on board the schooner active,
Wilcox, master, and consigned to said Claude Frs.
Girod, as appears from the sales book No. 1,
aforesaid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 991.38
The 12th item, amounting in capital to the sum of
$13,901.94, consists of divers lots of merchandises
and jewelry belonging to N. Girod, which the said
Claude Francois Girod sent into the provinces of
the interior, and there sold, or caused to be sold.
The accounts of those sales were never settled
between Claude Francois and Nicolas Girod, which
fact is attested by the declaration of Jean Francois
Girod, and several other witnesses, who testify that
Claude Frs. Girod has constantly avoided to render
said account. The several articles composing the
present item are enumerated and detailed in the
aforementioned sales book No. 1, which the arbitrators
have ascertained to be in the handwriting of
Guilhempan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,901.94
The 13th item, amounting in capital to $6,574.30,
consists of the balance of an account between Nicolas
and Claude F. Girod, adjusted on 1 August,
1813, by Mr. Phillippon, Jr., who was authorized
for that purpose by the said Claude F. Girod.
The arbitrators, after examining that account and
the one preceding it, are satisfied that the articles
mentioned in said accounts are foreign to the affairs
which existed between the said Nicolas and Claude
Frs. Girod. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,574.30
Secondly. The arbitrators have examined and verified
the account of interests also making part of the
claims of said Nicolas Girod, as follows, viz.:
Interests on $1,602, amount of the first item of the
account produced by Nicolas Girod, from November,
1794, to the date hereof, making, in all, 20 years,
at 6 percent per annum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,922.40
Interests on $1,500, amount of the 2d item, from the
year 1794 to the date hereof, that is, 20 years, at
6 percent per annum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,800.00
Ditto, on $6,222.18, amount of the 3d item; the arbitrators
have examined the eight parts whereof this item is
composed, and found that the interests calculated on
each part amounted to $7,087.92, wherefore they have
been of opinion to leave the item as it was presented . . 6,657.61
Ditto, on the $186, amount of the 4th item, from January,
1797, to this day, making 17 years, 10 months, at 6
percent per annum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199.02
Ditto, on $651.50, amount of the 5th item. The arbitrators
have reduced the amount claimed, to-wit,
$664.02, to $504.91, because the interests ought to have
been calculated only from the 1st of January, 1802, when
the 2 bales of drilling shipped by Thibaut, were sold --
this gives 12 years and 11 months, at 6 percent per
annum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 504.91
Ditto, on $229.06, amount of the 6th item. The arbitrators
have verified the calculation, which they have found
correct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233.58
Ditto, on $379.12, amount of the 7th item. The calculation
was verified, and found correct . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382.78
Ditto, on $813.82, amount of the 8th item. The calculation
was verified, and found correct . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817.90
Ditto, on $899, amount of the 9th item. The calculation
was examined, and found correct . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876.52
Ditto, on $489.63, amount of the 10th item; after
examination, found correct. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477.75
Interests on $991.38, amount of the 11th item, examined,
and found correct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996.22
Ditto, on $13,901.94, amount of the 12th item; examined,
and found correct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,998.30
Ditto, on $6,574.30, amount of the 13th and last item of
the account presented by Nicolas Girod. The arbitrators,
after examining the calculation, found that it fell
short of what it ought to have been, but as the
difference is trifling, and in favor of the heirs, they
left the item as it was presented . . . . . . . . . . . . 493.06
Capital and interests due, after examination. . . . . . . . $62,769.98
The arbitrators next proceeded to verify and examine the
sums with which the said Nicolas Girod has credited the
account he has produced, which sums amount, in capital
and interests, to $22,351.89, and were found correct. . . 22,351.89
Balance in favor of Nicolas Girod . . . . . . . . . . . . . $40,418.09
So that the balance in favor of Nicolas Girod is reduced to $40,418.09 instead of $40,579.20, as claimed in his account, this difference being produced by the reduction made on the interests of the 5th item of said account. The arbitrators, after having examined and heard the declarations of Messrs. Pre. Bousignes, M. Pacaud, Joseph Guillot, and Jean Francois Girod, witnesses introduced by the parties, and sworn by John S. Lapauze, a justice of the peace, who positively assert that Claude Francois Girod has always refused to settle his accounts with his brother, Nicolas Girod, and after a scrupulous examination of the books, accounts, titles, and other documents which were produced in this
affair, are of opinion that the sum of forty thousand four hundred and eighteen dollars and nine cents, claimed by said Nicolas Girod, is lawfully due to him. In faith whereof, we have signed the present award, that it may have its legal effect given to it.
"New Orleans, this fourteenth day of the month of December, eighteen hundred and fourteen."
"[Signed] F. MEFFRE ROUZAN"
"F. PERCY, JUN'R"
"On this, the twelfth day of the month of December, 1814, in the thirty-ninth year of the independence of the United States of America, before me, one of the justices of the peace for the City and Parish of New Orleans, personally appeared, as requested by the parties, Mr. Joseph Guillot, a witness in the case of Nicolas Girod v. Jean Francois Girod, one of the testamentary executors of the late Claude Francois Girod, and Charles Robert Caune, attorney for the absent heirs, who, being duly sworn according to law, declared and said that he has always been a friend of the Girods, and that some time in the month of July, 1813, the late Claude Francois Girod, being in town, came to deponent's house, and requested him to call upon him in his room, saying that he had something to confide to him, and that having repaired thither, said Claude Francois Girod communicated his intentions of preventing all difficulties after his death, saying that he was desirous to settle with his brother Nicolas, that he had been to church, where he had knelt before the Holy Virgin, beseeching her to assist him in terminating his affairs with his said brother Nicolas; deponent, knowing nearly all their affairs, asked him in what manner he intended to settle them; then the said Claude Francois Girod told him -- here are my propositions; I will sell my house in St. Louis Street for cash to my said brother Nicolas, with a view to settle with him, reserving, for the term of my natural life, the use of one of the back rooms of said house; and if there be any balance remaining due to him, he will grant me a delay to pay the same, and he requested deponent to submit those propositions to Nicolas Girod's consideration, which deponent did; but the said Nicolas Girod answered him surely, No; and added that he requested deponent not to interfere in that affair, saying that he himself had made proposals to Claude Francois Girod, his brother."
"Deponent further says, that he knows well that said affairs between Nicolas and Claude Francois Girod were never settled; and he has signed with us."
"[Signed] JN. FRS. GIROD, Test'y Executor"
"R. CAUNE, Attorney for absent heirs"
"Sworn to and subscribed before me, at New Orleans, this 12 December, 1814."
"[Signed] JH.L. LAPANGE, Justice of the Peace"
"Order, 15 December, 1814"
"JEAN FRANCOIS GIROD, Ex. of C.F."
"Girod, and C. R. CAUNE, Att'y &c."
"Upon motion of Alfred Hennen, Esq., counsel for the plaintiff, and upon reading and filing the report of the arbitrators appointed in this case, it is ordered, that the defendants do show cause on Saturday next, the 17th instant, if any they have or can, why the said report should not be homologated, and made the judgment of this Court in the premises."
"Sheriff's Return on Copy of the above Order"
"Served copy of the within order on each of the defendants, December 15, 1814."
"[Signed] J. H. HOLLAND, Deputy Sheriff"
"Order and Judgment"
"It is ordered, that the report of the arbitrators be homologated, and made the judgment of the court in this case, and that the said defendants do pay to plaintiff, in conformity to the said award, the sum of forty thousand four hundred and eighteen dollars and nine cents, with costs of suit to be taxed."
"New Orleans, May 6, 1815"
"[Signed] J. PITOT, Judge"
"I do hereby certify this to be a true copy of all the records, documents, and proceedings had in this case. Clerk's office of the Parish Court, New Orleans, January 10, 1844."
"[Signed] ALFRED BODIN, Deputy Clerk"
In the preceding March, Jean Francois Girod had brought in an account against the succession, and passed it through a similar process, which resulted in a judgment in his favor for the sum of $8,253.20.
The bill of the complainants in the court below then charged, that nearly all the co-heirs, having full faith and confidence in the honesty and integrity of Nicholas and Jean Francois Girod, did entrust them with their powers of attorney, authorizing them to represent the interests of such co-heirs in the settlement of the succession, in virtue of which the executors approved the account rendered by themselves. And that afterwards, by concealment of facts which they knew to exist, and were bound, as agents, to communicate, the
said executors obtained from some of them an acquittance or transfer of all claims against the succession.
The bill then recited that Nicholas Girod had died, in possession of all the real estate of Claude Francois Girod except some parts which were mentioned as having been sold, all of which property thus remaining with Nicholas Girod the complainants claimed as the original co-heirs of Claude Francois Girod, and also an account of the rents and profits. All claim against the other executor, Jean Francois Girod, was released.
Amongst the matters introduced in evidence was the following letter, which is inserted because it is referred to in the opinion of the court, and was sent by Girod at the same time that he obtained from his two sisters the receipts which are mentioned in another part of this statement.
"New Orleans, 27 May, 1817"
"My sister Quetend: Tomorrow our brother Jean Francois embarks for Havre; from thence he will proceed home, for the purpose of delivering to each one of you what is coming to him from the succession of our late brother, Claude Francois. I assure you, that if I had not been anxious to protect the honor of this brother, everything would have been absorbed in settlement of accounts with me, and by other debts; besides, whether you have it now or later, the greater part cannot escape you; this is to be understood of those who shall not cease to merit our friendship and esteem. Beware not to imitate the example of Jacques, who has forever lost our regard by his iniquities toward our whole family. Hereafter, when I shall have, in some measure, recovered from my losses by different bankrupts, I will send you some assistance from time to time. At present J. F. has orders to regulate his conduct towards you all by your conduct towards him. Farewell."
"I cordially embrace you all."
"Your brother and friend,"
"[Signed] N. GIROD"
"I have not time to write to you more at length, having much to attend to before the departure of my brother."
The original is endorsed:
"Recorded in consular book G, page 94."
"Paris, 22 January, 1844."
"[Signed] LORENZO DRAPEZ [SEAL]"
"Consul United States"
Proved and admitted in evidence, April 29, 1844.
On 19 January, 1830, Jean Francois Girod executed to his brother and co-executor, Nicholas, the following deed.
"On this nineteenth day of the month of January of the year
eighteen hundred and thirty, and of the independence of the United States of America the fifty-fourth, before me, Louis T. Caire, a notary public in and for the Parish and City of New Orleans, duly commissioned and sworn, and in the presence of the witnesses hereinafter named and undersigned, personally appeared Mr. Jean Francois Girod, Jr., residing at Paris, in the Kingdom of France, and now in this city, herein acting for himself and in his own right, of the one part, and Mr. Nicolas Girod, his brother, residing in this city, and herein acting for himself, and in his own right, of the other part, who declared that they own, in common, for a moiety each, several landed properties, and, among others, a sugar plantation, situated on Bayou Lafourche, Parish of Assumption, in this state, which they have for several years cultivated as partners, the said Nicolas Girod having the exclusive administration of the same, and being clothed with the necessary powers to that effect; but that from the date hereof the partnership between them is amicably dissolved, by consent of both parties."
"And the said Jean Francois Girod moreover declared that he sells, abandons, transfers, and sets over, without any other warranty than that arising of his personal acts and deeds, but with substitution and subrogation to all the warranties which have been given to them by their original vendors, unto the said Nicolas Girod, his brother, here present, and accepting purchaser, for himself, his heirs and assigns:"
"1. The undivided moiety of a sugar plantation, seven leagues distant from the River Mississippi, situate on Bayou Lafourche, in the Parish of Assumption, as it now is, or may be, together with the undivided moiety of the improvements, slaves, animals, ameliorations, implements of husbandry, and all other objects or things whatever appertaining thereto."
"2. The undivided moiety of all the lands belonging to them in common, and situated on Bayou Lafourche."
"3. The undivided moiety of three islands lying at the mouth of said Bayou, and known as Timballier, Bross, and Caillon islands."
"The whole of which had been acquired, on joint account, by the said appearers, by purchase from the late Joseph St. Felix, as per act executed before F. Courvaisier, judge of the aforesaid Parish of Assumption, on the eighteenth of February, eighteen hundred and fourteen, the said St. Felix had purchased the same at the judicial sale of the property belonging to the succession of the late Claude Francois Girod, who in his lifetime had acquired the same by purchase from divers persons; the said purchaser acknowledging that he is fully satisfied with the said titles, and declaring that he is well acquainted with the said plantation, lands, animals, slaves, and improvements, which are the subject matter of this act, and requires nothing further."
"But it is well understood and agreed upon, by and between the
parties hereto, that the sugar and molasses now on said plantation and in the sugar house are not included in this sale, and that the net produce thereof shall be equally divided between the parties."
"And the said Jean Francois Girod moreover declared, that he also transfers and abandons, unto the said Nicolas Girod, his brother, all and singular the debts due to said plantation, as also all such sum or sums as now are, or may hereafter be, due to said partnership or community, under what title, and for what reason or reasons soever, hereby giving unto his said brother full power and authority to sue for and enforce the payment thereof, but without recourse against the transferor."
"The present sale and transfer of debts are made and accepted by the contracting parties for and in consideration of the price and sum of seventeen thousand dollars, in payment whereof the said purchaser, Nicolas Girod, has presently subscribed to the order of the said Jean Francois Girod, his brother, three promissory notes, each for a like sum of twenty-three thousand three hundred and thirty-three dollars thirty-three and one-third cents, the first payable on the first of March, eighteen hundred and thirty-one, the second on the first of March, eighteen hundred and thirty-two, and the third on the first of March, eighteen hundred and thirty-three, with power and faculty, however, to postpone the payment of said notes, or of parts thereof, from year to year, by paying to the said Jean Francois Girod, or to the holder of the notes the payment whereof shall have been postponed, a yearly interest, at the rate of eight percentum per annum, until final payment; which said notes, after being marked ne varietur by the notary undersigned, to identify them herewith, were handed over to the said Girod, who acknowledges the receipt thereof, and gives full and ample acquittance for the same."
"By means of the foregoing, but provided the aforesaid notes be paid, the said Jean Francois Girod transfers and abandons unto the said Nicolas Girod all the rights of ownership whatever which he had, has, or may have, in and to the plantation, lands, slaves, animals, implements of husbandry, in a word, in and to all the property which they owned in common, wishing that the said Nicolas Girod be seized of the same, and may enjoy, use, and dispose thereof, as of things to him well and lawfully belonging, from this day and forever."
"And the said appearers have furthermore declared, that by act before G. R. Stringer, a notary in this city, bearing date the fifteenth of May, eighteen hundred and twenty-nine, Mr. Nicolas Girod, acting for himself, and in the name and with the consent of his brother, sold to Messrs. Abner Robinson and Benjamin Ballard a tract of land situated in the Parish of Assumption, and belonging to the community aforesaid, for the price of fifteen thousand dollars, five thousand whereof were paid cash, and converted to
the use of said sugar plantation and other property; that the ten thousand dollars payable at one, two, and three years from the date of the act aforesaid belong to them for a moiety each, but that the said Jean Francois Girod assigns to Nicolas Girod his share of five thousand dollars in said debt, on condition that the latter shall credit his running account with a sum of twenty-five hundred dollars, as for money had and received, and without recourse to the assignor, who moreover transfers to said Nicolas Girod, without exception or reservation any, all the rights, actions, privileges, and mortgages accessory to the aforesaid debt of five thousand dollars, being the transferor's share in the price of the sale aforesaid."
"And the notary undersigned having made known to the parties hereto article 3,328 of the new Civil Code of Louisiana, which reads as follows:"
" Every notary who shall pass an act of sale, mortgage, or donation, of an immovable or slave, shall be bound to obtain from the office of mortgages of the place where the immovable is situated, or where the seller, debtor, or donor has his domicile, if it be of a slave, a certificate declaring the privileges or mortgages, which may be inscribed on the object of the contract, and to mention them in his act, under penalty of damages towards the party who may suffer by his neglect in that respect,"
"they, the said parties, declared, that, as tenants in common, they are fully aware of the state of things in relation to the immovables and slaves, object of this sale, and that they do hereby, jointly and separately, relieve and free the notary undersigned from all liability on that subject."
"Done and passed in my office, at New Orleans, the day, month, and year first above written, in the presence of Messrs. Charles Darcantel and Jose Antonio Bermudez, witnesses hereto required, and domiciled in this city, who have signed with the said appearers and me, notary, after reading hereof."
"[Signed] JN. FS. GIROD"
"J. ANTONIO BERMUDEZ"
"LOUIS T. CAIRE, Notary Public"
About the 1st of September, 1840, Nicholas Girod died, in New Orleans, leaving the following will:
"Will of Nicolas Girod -- Filed 30th January, 1841"
"Ne varietur. New Orleans, 30 January, 1841."
"[Signed] J. BERMUDEZ, Judge"
A due bill to the Mayor of New Orleans, for the
sum of $100,000.00, to be employed in the
construction of a building called by the name of
"N. Girod," in the Parish of Orleans, to receive
and come to the relief of the French orphans
inhabiting the State of Louisiana . . . . . . . . . $100,000.00
A due bill to the treasurer of the Charity Hospital . 30,000.00
A due bill to the president of the Catholic Asylum. . 30,000.00
No. 4. A due bill to Mrs. Bouvard, born Poidebard,
of Bordeaux . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,000.00
5. Do. Mr. Vollier Poidebard, at Chamberry. . . 30,000.00
6. Do. Mr. Joseph Girod . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,000.00
7. Do. Mr. G. Montamat. . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,000.00
8. Do. Mr. A. Michoud . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,000.00
9. Do. Mr. F. Grima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,000.00
10. Do. Mr. Dejan Sr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,000.00
11. Do. Mr. D. Prieur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,000.00
12. Do. Mr. Chs. Claiborne . . . . . . . . . . . 15,000.00
13. Do. Mr. M'ville Marigny. . . . . . . . . . . 15,000.00
14. Do. Mrs. Widow Sabatier. . . . . . . . . . . 20,000.00
15. Do. Mr. A. Fournier. . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,000.00
16. Do. Mr. E. Rivolet . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,000.00
17. Do. Mr. E. Mazureau. . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,000.00
18. Do. Mr. C. Gurlie. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,000.00
"I certify that the eighteen due bills, above mentioned, are, and constitute, my sole and last will."
"New Orleans, 23 December, 1837."
"[Signed] N. GIROD"
The following is a specimen of one of these due bills:
"Good for the sum of fifty thousand dollars, payable to Mr. A. Michoud, at the settlement of my estate."
"$50,000. No. 8. [Signed] N. GIROD"
All these legatees were made defendants to the bill.
In the course of the suit an injunction was issued against Antoine Michoud, the executor of Nicholas Girod, to prevent him from making any payment or distribution of the funds received or to be received.
The defendants all answered, the principal answer being that of the legatees. They denied that Claude Francois Girod enumerated in his will and codicil all the debts due by him, but averred that he owed other and much larger debts; insisted that the authorization granted to the executors by the will, for the sale of the property, was legal; that no law of Louisiana, then existing, contained a provision by which a judge ex officio auctioneer was rendered incompetent, any more than any other auctioneer in the state, to sell any property whatsoever, situated within or without the limits of his jurisdiction; averred that, as no complaint was
made of the price of the property so sold by the judge, the circumstance that a portion of the property was beyond his jurisdiction was of no consequence, and the price thereof must be regarded as fair, and the sale as having been duly made; admitted the sales of property to St. Felix and Laignel, but denied that any retrocession of the property to the executors ever took place, inasmuch as no retrocession could take place between the parties unless the executors had been previously the sole and exclusive owners of the property; denied that any fraud or breach of trust was committed by the executors.
The respondents in their answer also admitted that the executors had placed themselves as creditors in their account of the succession, but averred that they had a right lawfully and justly to do so; that Nicholas Girod was creditor by virtue of a final judgment of a competent tribunal -- namely the Parish Court of the Parish and City of New Orleans -- rendered on 6 May, 1816; they further aver that this judgment has, for upwards of twenty-six years past, acquired the force of res adjudicata, and cannot be disturbed; that the account presented by the executors was duly homologated by the Court of Probates, and that judgment of homologation has also acquired the force of res adjudicata. The respondents also deny that the executors, in placing themselves as creditors of the succession in their account and in ratifying that account under the power of attorney entrusted to them by their co-heirs, abused the trust and betrayed the interest confided to them for their own advantage, and to the wrong and injury of their constituents.
The respondents further denied that Nicholas Girod, by means of false and fraudulent representations or concealment, had induced the complainants to sign acquittances; averred that they were signed freely, after being well informed of all the circumstances; that Hyppolite Pargoud, the son of Madame Pargoud, had been in New Orleans &c.
The respondents inserted in their answer a number of family letters, from which they inferred that Nicholas Girod was a charitable man and had constantly been the supporter of his distant relations, and concluded by pleading prescription.
To these answers there was a general replication.
In the progress of the suit the following admissions were filed by the respective parties:
"Admissions of Plaintiffs"
"PARGOUD v. MICHOUD"
"1. Jean Francois Girod, Sr., died, leaving a will in favor of Jean Francois Girod, Jr., of Paris, and the share of the complainants, M'mes Pargoud and Adam, in the estate of Claude Francois Girod remained as it previously was, to-wit, one eighth. "
"2. The complainants will contest no portions of the account rendered by the testamentary executors of C. F. Girod to the Court of Probates in 1817, except the individual claims of the said two executors, and the judgments obtained on them."
"3. The heirs of Claude Francois Girod, with the exception of Nicolas Girod and Jean Francois Girod, Jr., resided in Europe."
"4. All the legatees of Claude Francois Girod resided in Europe, except the Parish Church of Assumption, Francois Wiltz, Francoise, the daughter of Rosette Celan, the wife of Mellion, and Pauline and Dominick, who resided in Louisiana."
"5. The lots of which Nicolas Girod has made a donation to the Poydras Asylum were worth, at the time of said donation, $35,000 or thereabouts."
"6. Nicolas Girod always resided in Louisiana, and never went to Europe after his settlement in this city under the Spanish government."
"7. All the letters mentioned in the printed answer, from 27 to 38 inclusive, are admitted to be genuine, and the translations of parts thereof in said answer are admitted to be correct, but the complainants will require complete translations of them to be prepared, and they reserve the right of objecting to their admissibility on other grounds, if any they have."
"8. Hyppolite Pargoud was brought to Louisiana by his uncle, Jean Francois Girod, Jr., and has resided with him in Ouachita up to the year 1821, when said uncle went to Paris."
"9. The residence of M'me Adam, of M'me Quetand, and of Jacqueline Poidebard, the wife of Joseph Rivolet, was at Thones, in Savoy."
"10. The age of Jean Francois Girod, Jr., now residing at Paris, is seventy-two. He is unmarried. Has no other heirs at law except the complainants, and some relatives of the same degree, or their legal representatives. He is on good terms with the complainants, and he and Hyppolite Pargoud, the attorney in fact of the complainants, are intimate friends, and Antoine Michoud is his attorney in fact."
"11. The two acquittances of M'mes Pargoud and Adam, mentioned in the answer, and since deposited in court, are admitted to be genuine, and the said complainants were, in executing them, authorized and assisted by their husbands."
"12. Hippolyte Pargoud is a man of good business habits, attentive and intelligent. He visited his family in 1827 and 1835, but at each visit stayed but a very short time with them. In 1837, he obtained a power of attorney from his mother authorizing him to claim and recover her share in the estate of Claude Francois Girod. It was shown to Antoine Michoud, to be by him attested or legalized, as Sardinian consul, but it was not made use of. Hyppolite Pargoud demanded and obtained another, which was executed before
a notary public on 18 May, 1840. From the time he received the first power, he made no secret of his intention of bringing a suit against his uncle Nicolas, and after receiving the second power, when making the inventory at Lafourche, where he was present, he said that if there had been a will or testament made by his said uncle, he would have sued his succession in the name of his mother."
"13. The letters which have been heretofore deposited by the defendants in the hands of the clerk of the court are genuine, and all signed by the parties in whose names they are written. But the complainants reserve all other objections to their admissibility, and if they are admitted in evidence, they must be translated."
"14. The will of Nicolas Girod was not known when the said inventory was made at Lafourche; it was discovered to exist some time thereafter."
"15. By the laws of the Duchy of Savoy, Hyppolite Pargoud is a forced heir of his mother, Peronne Bernardine Pargoud, one of the complainants."
"16. Nicolas Girod was the eldest of the family. He was __ years old when he died."
"17. In November, 1833, Nicolas Girod made a present to Philippine Poidebard, his niece (widow Nicoud), of the sum of 3,240 francs, equal to $648, and in March, 1834, he made her another present of 22,000 francs, equal to $4,400, both which presents she received."
"[Signed] J. P. BENJAMIN, for complainants"
And on the 29th of April, 1844, the following admissions of defendants were filed.
"Admissions of Defendants"
"PARGOUD v. MICHOUD"
"1. Denise Philippine Poidebard, the widow of Pierre Nicoud, died in August, 1841, leaving three legitimate children, viz., Benoite Colline Nicoud, Maurice Emilie Nicoud, and Jeannie Benoite Nicoud, the last of whom is a minor; Jean Berger is her tutor. All these parties, as well as Louis Joseph Poidebard, never were in the United States."
"2. The allegations in the answer of Jean Firman Pepin, as syndic of Jean Francois Girod, Jr., concerning the transmission of the latter's interest in the subject matter of this suit, are correct, viz., that Pierre Nicolas Girod died at New Orleans, on 1 September, 1841, leaving a testament, by act, before Joseph Cuvillier, notary public, of 6 February, 1841, by which he bequeathed all his property to the said Jean Francois Girod, Jr., his brother; the said Jean Francois Girod, Jr., made a cession of property in the District Court of the First Judicial District, on 25 January, 1842; that thereby the interest of both Pierre
Nicolas and Jean Francois Girod, Jr., is vested in the creditors of the said Jean Francois Girod, Jr., and that said Jean Firman Pepin is the syndic of the said creditors."
"3. All the property described in the inventory of the estate of Nicolas Girod, as being situated in the second municipality, is derived from the estate of Claude Francois Girod. Nicolas Girod never improved this property, but leased it to John F. Miller, by two acts passed before L. T. Caire, notary public, on 9 May, 1829, and 30 April, 1831; each of these leases is for the space of twenty years and for an annual rent of $3,000."
"4. The age of Jean Baptiste Dejan, aine, is sixty-seven years, and that of Claude Gurlie seventy-two years. The former is a native of New Orleans, the latter has resided in New Orleans forty-eight years, and was intimate with Nicolas Girod as early as 1814."
"5. Nicolas Girod never cultivated or occupied any of the lands mentioned in the bill as situated on Bayou Lafourche except the plantation, but made levees "
"6. The Bouvard family resided in 1813 and has ever since been residing at or near Bordeaux, in France."
"7. The age of Etienne Rivolet, one of the legatees of N. Girod, is forty years. He is not related to the Girod family except by his brother, who married Jaqueline Poidebard, one of the nieces of Claude Francois Girod, the testator, and who is therefore his sister-in-law."
"[Signed] MAZUREAU, for defendants"
And on 29 of April, the following was offered in evidence and filed.
"UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT"
"WIDOW PARGOUD AND OTHERS"
"v. In chancery"
"ANTOINE MICHOUD AND OTHERS"
"Admissions and Agreements between the Parties"
"1. Admitted that one Joseph Gaubuan and one Corrino, witnesses on the part of the defendants, would, on being examined upon their oaths, declare that it was to the perfect previous knowledge, and with the consent and authorization of Jean Francois Girod, Jr., one of the testamentary executors of Claude Francois Girod, that Simon Laignel did bid and become the purchaser, at the public sale made by the register of wills, in the City of New Orleans, of the faubourg and city property belonging to said Claude Francois Girod, after his death, and further that it was also to the perfect knowledge, and with the consent and authorization, of said Jean Francois Girod that afterwards the said Simon Laignel sold the same property to Nicolas Girod, the co-testamentary executor of said Jean Francois. "
"2. All objections are waived which might have been made in consequence of the answers of the defendants, to whom interrogatories have been administered and propounded, being sworn to before Justice Jackson, and it is agreed that the said answers, so sworn to, shall have the same force and effect as if they had been sworn to before the proper officer."
"[Signed] L. JANIN"
"New Orleans, 29 April, 1844"
On 29 of July, 1844, the court made a decree of which the following is a copy.
"This cause came on to be heard this term, and was argued by counsel, and thereupon, upon consideration thereof, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed as follows:"
"That the plaintiffs are the residuary legatees of Claude Francois Girod, deceased, in the following proportion, viz., Peronne Bernardine Girod, the widow of Jean Pierre Hector Pargoud, for one-eighth; Rosalie Girod, the widow of Louis Adam, for one-eighth; Francoise Peronne Quitand, the wife of J. A. Allard, for one forty-eighth; Marie Philippine Rose Quitand, for one forty-eighth; Marie Bernard Quitand, for one forty-eighth; Louis Joseph Poidebard, for one forty-eighth; Benoite Colline Nicoud, for two two-hundred-and-eighty-eighths; Maurice Emilie Nicoud, and Jenny Benoite Nicoud, represented by Jean Berger, their tutor, each for two two-hundred-and-eighty-eighths; Jean Francois Girod, the nephew, in his own right and as testamentary heir of Pierre Nicolas Girod, his brother, and represented by Jean Firman Pepin, the syndic of his creditors, for one-twentieth; and Francoise Clementine Girod, wife of Pierre Francois Pernond, for one-fortieth."
"That the adjudication of landed property, with the slaves thereto attached, situated on Bayou Lafourche, made on 18 February, 1814, to Charles St. Felix; the retrocession of said property by said Charles St. Felix to Nicolas and Jean Francois Girod on 23 February, 1814; the adjudication of the property situated in the Parish of Orleans, made to Simon Laignel on 9 April, 1814, and the notarial seal made to the same on 26 April, 1814, in pursuance of said adjudication, and the conveyance of said property to Nicolas Girod, of 28 April, 1814, be set aside and annulled, saving, however, the just rights of third persons, to whom two tracts of land on Bayou Lafourche, two slaves, and a piece of ground in the City of New Orleans were conveyed by the said Nicolas Girod in his lifetime, as appears from the admissions in the pleadings."
"That the dative testamentary executors of the late Nicolas Girod do execute to the plaintiffs, or to their legal representatives, good and valid notarial conveyances and assignments of such undivided portions of the aforesaid property as correspond to the proportions
in which they are residuary legatees of the late Claude Francois Girod as herein before declared, which conveyances and assignments are to be settled by Duncan N. Hennen, as master in chancery of this Court, in the event of a difference between the parties in relation thereto."
"And for greater certainty it is hereby declared that the property of which undivided portions are to be conveyed and assigned to the plaintiffs as aforesaid is all the property and slaves which were inventoried in the Parishes of Ascension, Assumption, and Lafourche Interior, after the death of said Nicolas Girod, as belonging to his estate, and all the property which was inventoried after the death of said Nicolas Girod, as situated in the Municipality No. 2 of the City of New Orleans, including the property which is an alluvion and accessory to the property derived from the estates of Claude Francois Girod, was abandoned to Nicolas Girod by the heirs of Bertrand Gravier by an act of compromise executed on 29 March, 1823, and also the house and lot situated at the corner of St. Louis and Chartres Streets in Municipality No. 1 of the City of New Orleans."
"That the account filed by Nicolas Girod and Jean Francois Girod in the Court of Probates of the Parish of Orleans in May, 1817, be opened and set aside; that the sum of $40,418.09 claimed by Nicolas Girod in said account, and the sum of $8,253.20 claimed by Jean Francois Girod for himself in said account, be disallowed and rejected; that the two judgments which were obtained in the Parish Court of the Parish of Orleans in the year 1815 for the aforesaid two sums of $40,418.09, and $8,253.20, be declared satisfied, and that no allowance be made to the defendants on account of said judgments."
"That the two acquittances and releases given in 1817 by the plaintiffs, Madame Adam and Madame Pargoud, to Jean Francois Girod, be set aside and be allowed no other force or effect than as acknowledgments of the receipt by Madame Pargoud for 5,242.75 francs and by Madame Adam for the sum of 10,242 francs 75 c., making respectively the sum of $975.15 and $1,905.15 in the currency of the United States, as stated in said receipt."
"And it is ordered that a reference be made to the said master in chancery to take an account of what is due from the estate of Nicolas Girod to the plaintiffs on account of the property belonging to the estate of Claude Francois Girod and alienated by said Nicolas Girod, for rents and profits, and for interest, and of what may be due by the complainants to the estate of Nicolas Girod for payments made by the said Nicolas on account of the debts of the said Claude Francois Girod, and of the legacies made by him, and of permanent improvements; and in taking said account, said master shall charge the said estate with the value of the crop
alleged to have been on hand when the property in Lafourche was adjudicated to Charles St. Felix, with interest thereon; with the amounts which, by the aforesaid account of 1817, the said executors acknowledged to have received, or for which they consented to become responsible, from the time the same were received; with the price at which the two tracts of land on Bayou Lafourche and the two slaves were sold, and which are mentioned in the pleadings as having heretofore been sold, with interest thereon, from the time when, according to the bill of sale, said price was payable; with the sum of thirty-five thousand dollars, this being the admitted value of the price of the ground donated by Nicolas Girod to the Female Orphan Asylum, with interest thereon from the time said donation was made; with the rents and profits of the plantation and slaves, the house at the corner of Chartres and St. Louis Streets and the property in Faubourg St. Mary, now called the Second Municipality, from the adjudication of 1814, and at the rate which might reasonably and with a proper administration have been obtained for the same, it being understood that from the years 1829 and 1830, when the property in Faubourg St. Mary or Second Municipality still undisposed of was leased to John F. Miller, the rents and profits thereon are to be charged at the rate at which the rent was stipulated in the lease to said Miller."
"And the said master shall credit the estate of Nicolas Girod in said account with the amount with which said executors credited themselves in their account of 1817, with interest thereon, except their aforesaid two personal claims of $40,418.09, and $8,253.20, with any payments that have been made on account of legacies left by the said Claude Francois Girod, with interest thereon, and also with one-half of the rents and profits of the plantation and slaves of Bayou Lafourche up to the time when Jean Francois Girod sold his interest in the same to Nicolas Girod, the plaintiffs having in their bill consented to abandon the half of these rents and profits supposed to have been received by the said Jean Francois Girod, and also with the actual cost in money to Nicolas Girod, but without interest, of the permanent improvements made by said Nicolas Girod, and still in existence, on the lot at the corner of St. Louis and Chartres Streets, and on the lands on Bayou Lafourche, deducting therefrom the value of the labor of the slaves of the said plantation, and of the materials procured from the same, and making also proper deductions for the diminution in value of said improvements by wear and tear, and all the interest to be charged in said account shall be so charged at the rate of five percent"
"And the said master shall compute what amount of the balance so to be found against the estate of Nicolas Girod shall be paid to each of the plaintiffs, according to their declared proportionate interest in the estate of Claude Francois Girod, and said balance shall be paid to them, with interest, from the date up to which the
master's report may present a calculation of interest unless, on application of the parties, the court shall otherwise direct, and said payment shall be made by the dative testamentary executors of Nicolas Girod, out of the funds of said estate, in preference to any legacies. And for the better discovery of matters aforesaid, the parties are to produce before the said master, upon oath, all books, papers, and writings in their custody or power relating thereto as the said master shall direct. And the said master shall, when necessary, examine said parties upon written interrogatories."
"And it is further ordered that the said dative testamentary executors pay out of the funds of said estate the costs of this suit which have hitherto accrued. And it is further ordered that either party, if so advised, be at liberty to apply to the court for a partition in kind or by sale of the above-mentioned real estate of Nicolas Girod. And all further directions are reserved until the master shall bring in his report."
"Decree signed July 30, 1844."
"[Signed] THEO. H. McCALEB [SEAL]"
"United States Judge"
From this decree the defendants appealed to this Court
MR. JUSTICE WAYNE delivered the opinion of the Court.
The conclusions to which we have come in this cause do not require from us any comment upon its facts.
We concur with the learned judge in the circuit court in setting aside the purchases by which Nicholas Girod and Jean Francois Girod became the possessors of their testator's entire estate.
But the morality and policy of the law as it is administered in courts of equity induce us to add that those purchases were fraudulent and void, and may be declared to be so without any further inquiry upon the ground that they were made by the intervention of persons who were nominal buyers of the property for the purpose of conveying it to the executors. Such a transaction carries fraud upon the face of it. Lord Hardwicke v. Vernon, 4 Ves.Jr. 411; 14 Ves.Jr. 504; 2 Bro.C.C. 410, note. It matters not in such a case whether the sales are made with or without the sanction of judicial authority or with ministerial exactness. The rule of equity is, in every code of jurisprudence with which we are acquainted, that a purchase by a trustee or agent of the particular property of which he has the sale or in which he represents another, whether he has an interest in it or not -- per interpositam personam -- carries fraud on the face of it.
In this instance, Laignel and St. Felix were the instruments of the executors. They bid off the property, paid nothing, received titles, and conveyed what they nominally bought to the executors. In this way, Nicholas Girod became the purchaser of all the testator's property in New Orleans, and himself and his brother Jean Francois, the other executor, were joint purchasers of the lands and slaves in the Parish of Assumption and of the testator's lands elsewhere. Jean Francois, some years afterwards, sold out his half of their joint purchase to Nicholas for seventy thousand dollars. Thus the latter became the possessor of the entire estate, and held it until he died, to the exclusion of all the other testamentary heirs. Some of those heirs, and the representatives of others of them, now sue the representatives of Nicholas Girod and seek to set aside the purchases of the executors. They allege that they were fraudulently made, ask that they may have assigned to them their respective portions of the estate, with an account of rents and profits, excepting from their claim for the latter the moiety which had been received by Jean Francois Girod. The defendants reply and deny fraud in fact or in intention on the part of the executors. They declare that the sales were judicially ordered and conducted, that the purchases were rightfully made for a fair price at public auction, that the complainants have no standing in a court of equity by reason of their long silence, laches, and acquiescence in the acts of which they complain, and that their rights are barred by lapse of time under the laws of Louisiana. They also say that receipts or acquittances were given to the executors by two of the complainants which are valid and obligatory upon them. The bill and answers and the arguments of the learned counsel for the appellants, then, involve the question of the right of executors to purchase any part of the estate which they administer for a fair price at a public sale judicially ordered and conducted.
Remarking first that an executor or administrator
is in equity a trustee for heirs, legatees, and creditors, we proceed to give our opinion of the law in respect to purchases of the estate represented by them, and of purchases made by other trustees and agents, and all persons qui negotia aliena gerunt. The rule as to persons incapable of purchasing particular property except under particular restraints, on account of the rules of equity, is compendiously given by Sir Edward Sugden, in his second section of purchases by trustees, agents &c. It has been adopted by almost every subsequent writer, and we cite the passage with confidence, having verified its correctness by an examination of all the cases cited by him; by an examination, also, of other cases in the English courts, and of cases in the courts of chancery of several of the states in our Union, sustaining the doctrine, to the fullest extent, of the incapability of trustees and agents to purchase particular property, for the sale of which they act representatively, or in whom the title may be for another. He says
"It may be laid down as a general proposition, that trustees -- unless they are nominally such to preserve contingent remainders -- agents, commissioners of bankrupts, assignees of bankrupts, solicitors to the commission, auctioneers, creditors who have been consulted as to the mode of sale, or any persons who, by their connection with any other person, or by being employed or concerned in his affairs, have acquired a knowledge of his property, are incapable of purchasing such property themselves, except under the restraints which will shortly be mentioned. For if persons having a confidential character were permitted to avail themselves of any knowledge acquired in that capacity, they might be induced to conceal their information and not to exercise it for the benefit of the persons relying upon their integrity. The characters are inconsistent. Emptor emit quam minimo potest, venditor vendit quam maximo potest."
2 Sugd. Vendors and Purchasers 109, London ed., 1824. * The principle has been extended to a purchase by an
attorney from his client whilst the relation subsists. Bellew v. Russell, 1 Ball & Beatty 96; 9 Ves.Jr. 296; 13 Ves.Jr. 133. As to gifts. Lord Selsey v. Rhoades, 2 Sim. & Stu. 41; Williams v. Llewellyn, 2 You. & Jer. 68; Champion v. Rigby, 1 Russ. & Myl. 539. Nor can an arbitrator buy up the unascertained claims of any of the parties to the reference. Blennerhasset v. Day, 2 Ball & Beatty 116; Cane v. Lord Allen, 2 Dow 289. Where a person cannot purchase the estate himself, he cannot buy it as agent for another. 9 Ves.Jr. 248; Ex Parte Bennet, 10 Ves.Jr. 381.
The general rule stands upon our great moral obligation to refrain from placing ourselves in relations which ordinarily excite a conflict between self-interest and integrity. It restrains all agents, public and private, but the value of the prohibition is most felt, and its application is more frequent, in the private relations in which the vendor and purchaser may stand towards each other. The disability to purchase is a consequence of that relation between them which imposes on the one a duty to protect the interest of the other, from the faithful discharge of which duty his own personal interest may withdraw him. In this conflict of interest, the law wisely interposes. It acts not on the possibility that in some cases the sense of that duty may prevail over the motives of self-interest, but it provides against the probability in many cases, and the danger in all cases, that the dictates of self-interest will exercise a predominant influence and supersede that of duty. It therefore prohibits a party from purchasing on his own account that which his duty or trust requires him to sell on account of another, and from purchasing on account of another that which he sells on his own account. In effect he is not allowed to unite the two opposite characters of buyer and seller, because his interests, when he is the seller or buyer on his own account, are directly conflicting with those of the person on whose account he buys or sells. 2 Burge's Comm. 459. Cases have been frequently decided in the courts of Louisiana which maintain the rule in all its integrity. In Pennsylvania it is enforced, though, on looking over its reports, we find a case, but unsustained by any reference to adjudged cases, in which it is said that an executor might buy at a sale of the testator's effects, if he did so for a fair price at public auction. In Maryland the courts of chancery carry out the rule to the fullest extent of the principles upon which it is founded and as they have just been stated by us. In the case of Wormley v. Wormley, 8 Wheat. 421, this Court declared that no rule is better settled than that a trustee cannot become the purchaser of the trust estate. He cannot be at the same time vendor and vendee. It had been previously ruled, in the case of Prevost v. Gratz, 6 Wheat. 481, and this Court afterwards, in Ringo v. Binns, reaffirmed the rule, by its application to an agent who had bought land to which
his principal was in equity entitled. It said,
"The proposition laid down by this Court is that if an agent discovers a defect in the title of his principal to land, he cannot misuse it to acquire a title for himself, and if he does, that he will be held as a trustee holding for his principal."
35 U. S. 10 Pet. 269, 35 U. S. 281. See also the case of Oliver v. Piatt, 3 How. 333. It is also affirmed, in Church v. Marine Insurance Company, 1 Mason 341, that an agent or trustee cannot, directly or indirectly, become the purchaser of the trust property which is confided to his care. We scarcely need add that a purchase by a trustee of his cestui que trust, sui juris, provided it is deliberately agreed or understood between them that the relation shall be considered as dissolved,
"and there is a clear contract, ascertained to be such, after a jealous and scrupulous examination of all the circumstances, and it is clear that the cestui que trust intended that the trustee should buy, and there is no fraud, no concealment, and no advantage taken by the trustee of information acquired by him as trustee,"
will be sustained in a court of equity. But it is difficult to make out such a case where the exception is taken, especially when there is any inadequacy of price or any inequality in the bargain. Coles v. Trecothick, 9 Ves. 246; Fox v. Mackreth, 2 Bro.Ch. 400; Gibson v. Jeyes, 6 Ves. 277; Whichcote v. Lawrence, 3 Ves. 740; Campbell v. Walker, 5 Ves. 678; Ayliffe v. Murray, 2 Atk. 59. And therefore if a trustee, though strictly honest, should buy for himself an estate from his cestui que trust, and then should sell it for more, according to the rules of a court of equity, from general policy, and not from any peculiar imputation of fraud, he would be held still to remain a trustee to all intents and purposes, and not be permitted to sell to or for himself. 1 Story's Com. on equity (2d ed) 317; Fox v. Mackreth, 2 Bro.Ch. 400; S.C. 2 Cox 320, 327.
In New York there has been no relaxation of it since the decision in the case of Davoue v. Fanning, 2 Johns.Ch. 252. It is a critical and able review of the doctrine, as it had been applied by the English courts of chancery from an early day, and has been received, with very few exceptions, by our state chancery courts as altogether putting the rule upon its proper footing. Indeed it is not too much to say that it has secured the triumph of the rule over all qualifications and relaxations of it in the United States, to the same extent that had been achieved for it in England by that great chancellor, Lord Eldon. Davoue v. Fanning was the case of an executor for whose wife a purchase had been made by one Hedden, at public auction, bona fide, for a fair price, of a part of the estate which Fanning administered, and the prayer of the bill was that the purchase might be set aside and the premises resold. The case was examined with a special reference to the right of an executor to buy any part of the estate of his testator. And it was affirmed, and we think rightly, that if a trustee or person acting for others sells the
trust estate and becomes himself interested in the purchase, the cestuis que trust are entitled as of course to have the purchase set aside and the property reexposed to sale under the direction of the court. And it makes no difference in the application of the rule that a sale was at public auction, bona fide and for a fair price, and that the executor did not purchase for himself, but that a third person, by previous arrangement with the executor, became the purchaser, to hold in trust for the separate use and benefit of the wife of the executor, who was one of the cestuis que trust and who had an interest in the land under the will of the testator.
The inquiry, in such a case is not whether there was or was not fraud in fact. The purchase is void, and will be set aside at the instance of the cestui que trust and a resale ordered on the ground of the temptation to abuse and of the danger of imposition inaccessible to the eye of the court. We are aware that cases may be found in the reports of some of the chancery courts in the United States in which it has been held that an executor may purchase, if it be without fraud, any property of his testator at open and public sale for a fair price, and that such purchase is only voidable, and not void, as we hold it to be. But with all due respect for the learned judges who have so decided, we say that an executor or administrator is, in equity, a trustee for the next of kin, legatees, and creditors, and that we have been unable to find any one well considered decision, with other cases, or any one case in the books, to sustain the right of an executor to become the purchaser of the property which he represents, or any portion of it, though he has done so for a fair price, without fraud, at a public sale.
Why should the rule be relaxed in the case of persons most frequently exposed to the temptations of self-interest, who may yield to it more readily than any others, with a larger impunity, if the day of equitable retribution shall ever come for those who have been defrauded? Is it not better that the cause of the evil shall be prohibited than that courts of equity shall be relied upon to apply the remedy in particular cases by inquiring into all the circumstances of a case, whether there has or has not been fraud in fact? Is the rule to be relaxed, in the case of executors, in respect to all persons interested in the estate, or only to such of them as are sui juris? And if only to those who are sui juris, why in case of an executor as to such persons, when the rule has never been relaxed by any court of equity to permit purchases by any other trustee or agent of one who is sui juris? Shall it be relaxed in cases of those who are interested in the estate, and who are not sui juris or minors? Then other remedies must be devised to protect their interests than that which experience has shown to be alone efficacious. It is that when a trustee for one not sui juris sees that it is absolutely necessary that the estate must be sold, and he is ready to give more for it than anyone else, that a bill should be filed,
and he should apply to the court by motion, to let him be a purchaser. This is the only way he can protect himself. There are cases in which the court will permit it. Campbell v. Walker, 5 Ves.Jr. 478; 13 Ves.Jr. 601; 1 Ball & Beatty 418.
Such is the proceeding adopted in Louisiana when property in which a minor is interested is offered for sale, as may be seen by the case in 5 La. 16, McCarty v. Steam Cotton Press Company. The property was sold at auction, and the mother of the minor became the purchaser. It was contended that this purchase was null and void because the property had descended to the children immediately after the death of the father, and the mother, who, by the effect of the law, was their natural tutor, could not buy it. The court said it was a general rule. But it having been shown that the mother and purchaser had petitioned the Court of Probates for a ratification of the sale, and that the court had ratified it upon the advice of a family meeting, the sale was confirmed. And the court held that under the Spanish law (20) a tutor could purchase the property of his ward, with the permission of the judge.
We have said more upon the relaxation of the rule in the case of executors than we would have done if the learned counsel for the appellants had not pressed, as an exemption from the rule, purchases made by executors without fraud at open sale, especially when by the will they were empowered to sell the estate of their testator for the benefit of heirs and legatees, and were heirs or legatees themselves. And if it had not been urged that the decisions of the Supreme Court of Louisiana were unsafe guides in interpreting the Spanish laws in respect to the incapacity of persons to purchase at judicial sales particular property, on account of the official or financiering relation in which they stood to the persons who owned the property. It was supposed that the qualifications of the rule by the civil law embraced executors, or might do so by the reason upon which those qualifications were sustained. It imposes upon us the task of showing that the relaxations of the rule by the civil law were never permitted by the Spanish law which prevailed in Louisiana, and were never extended under the civil law, to permit the executor testamentarius or executor dativus to buy the property which he was appointed to administer. It is a subject of curious and instructive examination to trace the rule or prohibition, in the course of its application under the jurisprudence of different nations. In all of them there were limited and occasional relaxations of the rule in particular cases, in what are sometimes called hard cases, but in no one nation have purchases by executors been permitted, as a relaxation of the civil law rule. For a general historical examination of the subject, we have not time; we wish we had. A brief examination, however, of the qualifications of the rule by the civil law will not be inappropriate upon an appeal from a court held in Louisiana, where the civil
law exists in a modified form, and is still often the rule of decision by its enlightened jurists. The prohibition of the civil law is thus expressed: "Tutor rem pupilli emere non potest; idemque porrigendum est ad similia, id est, ad curatores, procuratores, et qui negotia aliena gerunt." Dig., Lib. 18 tit. 1, l. 34; Inst.Lib. 1, tit. 21, 23.
The rule as expressed embraces every relation in which there may arise a conflict between the duty which the vendor or purchaser owes to the person with whom he is dealing or on whose account he is acting, and his own individual interest. Nor was it ever relaxed or qualified by the civil law further than to allow the guardian to purchase the property of the ward, palam et bona fide, at public auction. "Cum ipse tutor nihil ex bonis pupilli, quae distrahi possunt, comparare palam et bona fide prohibetur; multo magis uxor ejus hoc facere potest." Cod., Lib. 4, tit. 38, l. 5. But foreseeing the mischief which might grow out of the relaxation, it required that the purchase must be made by the guardian himself, palam et bona fide, and not per interpositam personam.
"Sed si per interpositam personam rem pupilli emerit, in ea causa ut emptio nullius momenti sit, quia non bona fide videtur rem gessisse. Et ita est rescriptum a D. Severo et Antonino."
Dig., Lib. 26, tit. 5, l. 5, § 3. A purchase by a guardian from his co-guardian was permitted if it took place in public and bona fide.
"Item ipse tutor et emptoris et venditoris officio fungi non potest. Sed enim si contutorem habeat, cujus auctoritas sufficit, procul-dubio emere potest. Sed si mala fide emptio intercesserit, nullius erit momenti, ideoque nec usucapere potest. Sane, si suae aetatis factus comprobaverit emntionem, contractus valet."
Dig., Lib. 26, tit. 8, l. 5, § 2.
The guardian might purchase at a sale made at the suit of a creditor. "Si creditor pupilli distrahat, aeque emere bona fide poterit." Dig., Lib. 26, l. 5, § 5. Such is the extent of the qualification of the rule of the civil law. And, its limitation not being well understood, persons have often been misled to apply it to what they supposed to be analogous agencies, such as executors, when there was no authority either in the text of the civil law, or in the practice under it, for doing so. But further, those qualifications of the rule mentioned were confined in practice to those territories in Europe in which the civil law prevailed without modification. And it is remarkable, considering what were the influences upon Christendom of the civil law, after its discovery in the twelfth century -- and when not until some time after it began to be used as a rule of law by which public and private rights were determined -- when in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries it was the study of the wisest men -- it is remarkable that the qualifications of the rule, as they have been stated, were considered imperfections and were rejected by every nation in Europe whose codes are generally admitted to have been compiled from the civil law, with an intimate
knowledge of human nature, as it has always shown itself in the business of life. Here, appropriate to what has been just said, is the language of Pothier.
"Nous ne pouvons acheter, ni par nous memes, ni par personnes interposees, les choses que font partie des biens dont nous avons l'administration; ainsi un tuteur ne peut acheter les choses qui appartiennent a son mineur; un administrateur ne peut acheter aucune chose de bien dont il a l'administration."
Tr. du Contrat de Vente, part. 1, n. 13. The rule of the civil law, without qualification, is adopted in the codes of Holland.
"Quae vero de tutoribus cauta, ea quoque in curatoribus, procuratoribus, testamentorum executoribus, aliisque similibus, qui aliena gerunt negotia, probanda sunt."
Voet., Lib. 18, tit. 1, n. 9; 2 Burge's Comm. 463. In Spain, the rule was enforced without relaxation, and with stern uniformity. Judge McCaleb cites in his opinion, from the Novissima Recopilacion, the rule, in the following words.
"No man who is testamentary executor or guardian of minors, nor any other man or woman, can purchase the property which they administer, and whether they purchase publicly or privately, the act is invalid, and on proof's being made of the fact, the sale must be set aside."
This was the law of Louisiana when the executors in this instance made their purchases, and it is conclusive of the invalidity.
We have thus shown that those purchases are fraudulent and void from having been made per interpositam personam, and if they were not so on that account, that they are void by the rule in equity in the courts of England and as it prevails in the courts of equity in the United States. It has also been shown that they are void by the law of Louisiana as it was when they were made by the executors, and that such purchases never were countenanced in that state by any qualification of the civil law rule prohibiting purchases by those who stood in such fiduciary relations to others; that the act could not be generally done without creating a conflict between self-interest and integrity. In every aspect in which we have viewed this case, we are called upon to direct that the purchases made by Nicholas and Jean Francois Girod of their testator's estate should be set aside. We shall order it to be done. Nor do we think that the complainants have lost their rights by negligence or by the lapse of time. We can only see in their conduct the fears and forbearance of dependent relatives, far distant from the scene of the transactions of which they complain, desirous of having what was due to them, and suspecting it had been withheld, but unwilling to believe that they had been wronged by brothers with whom they had been associated in a common interest by another brother who was dead. In a case of actual fraud, courts of equity give relief after a long lapse of time, much longer than has passed since the executors in this instance purchased their testator's estate. In general, length of time is no
bar to a trust clearly established to have once existed, and where fraud is imputed and proved, length of time ought not to exclude relief. Prevost v. Gratz, 6 Wheat. 481. Generally speaking, when a party has been guilty of such laches in prosecuting his equitable title as would bar him if his title were solely at law, he will be barred in equity from a wise consideration of the paramount importance of quieting men's titles and upon the principle that expedit reipublicae ut sit finis litium; although the statutes of limitations do not apply to any equitable demand, courts of equity adopt them, or at least generally take the same limitations for their guide, in cases analogous to those in which the statutes apply at law. 10 Ves. 467; 1 Cox, 149. Still, within what time a constructive trust will be barred must depend upon the circumstances of the case. Boone v. Chiles, 10 Pet. 177. There is no rule in equity which excludes the consideration of circumstances, and, in a case of actual fraud, we believe no case can be found in the books in which a court of equity has refused to give relief within the lifetime of either of the parties upon whom the fraud is proved or within thirty years after it has been discovered or becomes known to the party whose rights are affected by it. In this case, that time has not elapsed since the executors made their purchases, and it is not pretended that they were known to any of the complainants until the year 1817, and not then except by the exhibition of an account by the executors to some of the complainants, with declarations that everything had been fairly done with a view to save the honor of the testator, and the interests of those who were the objects of his bounty. In this view of the case it is not necessary for us to consider the time within which remedies are barred or property may be acquired by prescription under the laws of Louisiana. We would willingly otherwise do so, for the result would show the same harmony in the application of the rules of the civil law and those of Louisiana upon prescription with the rules prevailing in courts of equity in England and the United States, as we trust has been shown to exist between them in the prohibition of an executor to buy the estate of his testator.
The receipts or acquittances given by two of the complainants to the executors do not affect their rights. They were obviously given without full knowledge of all the circumstances connected with the disposal and management of the estate. Indeed, it is plain that such information had been withheld by the executors. It is true that an account was presented to them, with official signatures to it but without vouchers of any kind to verify its correctness, and it was accompanied by a letter from Nicholas Girod, in which menaces of displeasure are mingled with intimations of future kindness.
We shall also direct the official proceedings which were had
upon the account of Nicholas Girod against the estate of Claude to be set aside and annulled. But there will be allowed to the representatives of Nicholas, in the settlement of the estate, the sum of $6,574.20, with interest at five percent. The proofs in the cause show that a few months before the death of the testator there had been a settlement of accounts between him and Nicholas, and we allow that amount, as it is charged in the general account, disallowing all the other items. We suppose it to be an inadvertency in drawing up the decree that the sum just mentioned was not allowed, as the learned judge, in his opinion, states that a settlement had taken place, with that result.
We shall also direct that the actual cost of all permanent improvements which were made upon any part of the estate by Nicholas Girod shall be allowed to his representatives, with interest at five percent in the settlement which shall be made with the complainants and the other persons having an interest under the will of Claude. And also an allowance for taxes and the expenses and cost paid in recovering the property gained by alluvion. A reference to a master will be directed. We regret to perceive from the record that all the persons who are interested in the estate of Claude F. Girod are not parties to this proceeding. We shall direct that they shall be permitted to make themselves parties if they please to become so. But in giving the order it is not intended to delay those from receiving their portions in whose behalf this decree is made. The fruits of their vigilance can be apportioned according to their respective rights in the estate, when one of the original testamentary heirs claims, and the circuit court, in the further proceedings in the cause under the mandate of this Court, will of course take care to ascertain who are the representatives of others of them who are dead.
Jean Francois Girod is not a party in this cause, and therefore we can give no decree against him, but should he offer to become a party for the purpose of claiming what under the will was his portion of the estate of Claude, or should it be claimed by any representative of his, we think it right to remark, for the purpose of preventing further litigation in this matter, that such claim will be subject to all the equities subsisting between Jean Francois and Nicholas, and especially to the allowance to the representatives of Nicholas of the purchase money which was given by Nicholas to Jean, for the one-half of their joint purchase of the property of their testator, with interest at the rate according to their contract up to the times when the purchase money was paid, and afterwards at five percent
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District
of Louisiana and was argued by counsel. Whereupon it is considered by the Court:
1. That the plaintiffs are residuary legatees of Claude Francois Girod, deceased, in the following proportion, namely: Peronne Bernardine Girod, the widow of Jean Pierre Hector Pargoud, for one-eighth; Rosalie Girod, the widow of Louis Adam, for one-eighth; Francoise Peronne Quitand, the wife of J. A. Allard, for one forty-eighth; Marie Philippine Rose Quitand, for one forty-eighth; Marie Bernard Quitand, for one forty-eighth; Louis Joseph Poidebard, for one forty-eighth; Benoite Colline Nicoud, for two two-hundred-and-eighty-eighths; Maurice Emilie Nicoud, and Jenny Benoite Nicoud, represented by Jean Berger, their tutor, each for two two-hundred-and-eighty-eighths; Jean Francois Girod, the nephew, in his own right, and as testamentary heir of Pierre Nicholas Girod, his brother, and represented by Jean Firman Pepin, the syndic of his creditors, for one-twentieth; and Francoise Clementine Girod, wife of Pierre Francois Pernond, for one-fortieth.
2. That the adjudication of landed property, with the slaves thereto attached, situated on Bayou Lafourche, made on 18 February, 1814, to Charles St. Felix; the retrocession of said property by said Charles St. Felix to Nicholas and Jean Francois Girod, on 23 February, 1814; the adjudication of the property situated in the Parish of Orleans made to Simon Laignel on 9 April, 1814, and the notarial seal made to the same on 26 April, 1814, in pursuance of said adjudication; and the conveyance of said property to Nicholas Girod, of 28 April, 1814, be set aside and annulled, saving, however, the just rights of third persons, to whom two tracts of land on Bayou Lafourche, two slaves, and a piece of ground in the City of New Orleans were conveyed by the said Nicholas Girod in his lifetime, as appears from the admissions in the pleadings.
3. That for the purpose of giving to the residuary legatees of the late Claude Francois Girod their proportions respectively of the estate of the testator, the said circuit court should direct either a sale of the said property, both real and personal, at such time and manner as said court shall see fit, or cause a partition in kind to be made of said property, as in the judgment of the said court might be deemed most advisable, and that in either case the said court should direct all the proper conveyances to be made accordingly.
4. And for greater certainty it is hereby declared that the property, of which undivided portions are to be conveyed and assigned to the plaintiffs as aforesaid, is all the property and slaves which were inventoried in the Parishes of Ascension, Assumption, and Lafourche Interior, after the death of said Nicholas Girod, as belonging to his estate; and all the property which was inventoried after the death of said Nicholas Girod, as situated in the Municipality
No. 2 of the City of New Orleans, including the property which is an alluvion, and accessory to the property derived from the estates of Claude Francois Girod, and which was abandoned to Nicholas Girod by the heirs of Bertrand Gravier, by an act of compromise executed on 29 March, 1823, and also the house and lot situated at the corner of St. Louis and Chartres Streets in Municipality No. 1 of the City of New Orleans.
5. That the adjudication made in the Parish Court of the Parish of Orleans in the year 1815 in favor of Nicholas Girod, for $40,418.09, and claimed by the said Nicholas in the account filed in the Court of Probates by Nicholas and Jean Francois Girod in May, 1817, be set aside, and instead thereof that the representatives of said Nicholas Girod be allowed, in the settlement of the accounts by the master in this cause, the sum of $6,576.20, with interest thereon at the rate of five percent per annum from 1 August, 1813.
6. That the two acquittances and releases given, in 1817, by the plaintiffs, Madame Adam and Madame Pargoud, to Jean Francois Girod, be set aside, and be allowed no other force or effect than as acknowledgments of the receipt by Madame Pargoud for 5,242 francs 75 c., and by Madame Adam for the sum of 10,242 francs 75c., making respectively the sum of $975.15, and $1,905.15, in the currency of the United States, as stated in said receipt, and that the said amounts should be deducted from their portions respectively in the distribution.
7. That a reference be made to a master in chancery to take an account of what is due from the estate of Nicholas Girod to the plaintiffs on account of the property belonging to the estate of Claude Francois Girod, and alienated by said Nicholas Girod, for rents and profits, and for interest, and of what may be due by the complainants to the estate of Nicholas Girod for payments made by the said Nicholas on account of the debts of the said Claude Francois Girod, and of the legacies paid by him, and of permanent improvements, and, in taking said account, said master shall charge the said estate with the value of the crop alleged to have been on hand when the property in Lafourche was adjudicated to Charles St. Felix, with interest thereon; with the amounts which, by the aforesaid account of 1817, the said executors acknowledged to have received, or for which they consented to become responsible, from the time the same were received, with the price at which the two tracts of land on Bayou Lafourche and the two slaves were sold, and which are mentioned in the pleadings as having heretofore been sold, with interest thereon from the time when, according to the bill of sale, said price was payable; with the sum of thirty-five thousand dollars, this being the admitted value of the price of the ground donated by Nicholas Girod to the Female Orphan Asylum, with interest thereon from the time said donation was made; with the
rents and profits of the plantation and slaves, the house at the corner of Chartres and St. Louis Streets, and the property in Faubourg St. Mary, now called the Second Municipality, from the adjudication of 1814, and at the rate which might reasonably, and with a proper administration, have been obtained for the same, it being understood that from the years 1829 and 1830, when the property in Faubourg St. Mary, or Second Municipality, still undisposed of, was leased to John F. Miller, the rents and profits thereon are to be charged at the rate at which the rent was stipulated in the lease to said Miller.
8. And the said master shall credit the estate of Nicholas Girod, on said account, with the amount with which said executors credited themselves in their account of 23 May, 1817, with interest thereon, except the personal claim of $40,418.09, in lieu of which this Court has directed the allowance of $6,576.30, being one of the items of the general account which was claimed by Nicholas Girod against Claude Francois Girod after the death of the said Claude, and the estate of Nicholas Girod shall be credited with any payments that have been made on account of legacies left by the said Claude, with interest thereon. And the estate of the said Nicholas Girod shall be credited with one-half of the rents and profits of the plantation and slaves of Bayou Lafourche, up to the time when Jean Francois sold his interest in the same to Nicholas Girod. And the said master shall also credit the estate of the said Nicholas Girod with the actual cost in money expended by the said Nicholas in permanent improvements, still in existence, of or upon any part of the estate of Claude Francois Girod, including improvements of the property gained by alluvion, accessory to the property derived from the estate of Claude Francois Girod, which was abandoned to Nicholas Girod by the heirs of Bertrand Gravier, by an act of compromise, executed on 29 March, 1823, and the expenses and cost paid by him in recovering the alluvion before mentioned, and including also improvements on the lot at the corner of St. Louis and Chartres Streets, and with improvements on the lands on Bayou Lafourche, deducting from these last the value of the labor of the slaves on the said plantation aiding and making such improvements, and of the materials procured from the same. And the actual cost in money of all improvements made by said Nicholas shall be allowed, with interest at five percent upon the same from the time it shall be ascertained or found by the master that the sums were expended. And allowance is also to be made to the estate of said Nicholas for all taxes paid on the property of Claude Francois Girod. And the said master is hereby authorized, for the discovery of the matters aforesaid, to receive from the parties, upon oath, books, and papers, and writings in their custody and power relating thereto, and also to examine witnesses orally or upon written interrogatories, in regard to the cost
of all improvements, due notice of his proceedings in this matter being given to the parties or their attorney.
9. And the said master shall compute what amount of the balance so to be found against the estate of Nicholas Girod shall be paid to each of the plaintiffs, according to their declared proportionate interest in the estate of Claude Francois Girod, and said balance shall be paid to them, with interest from the date up to which the master's report may present a calculation of interest, and said payment shall be made by the dative testamentary executors of Nicholas Girod, out of the funds of said estate, in preference to any legacies under the will of said Nicholas Girod. And for the better discovery of matters aforesaid, the parties are to produce before the said master, upon oath, all books, papers, and writings in their custody or power relating thereto, as the said master shall direct. And the said master shall, when necessary, examine said parties upon written interrogatories.
10. That any other person or persons, not now parties to the proceedings, claiming title to the funds or estate in controversy or to any part thereof, should be allowed to present their claims respectively before the said circuit court, to make due proofs thereof, and to become parties to the proceedings for the due establishment and adjudication thereof. And that the costs of this suit which have hitherto accrued in the said court should be paid by the said dative testamentary executors out of the funds of said estate.
11. It is thereupon now here adjudged and decreed by this Court that so much of the decree of the said circuit court as conforms to the decree and opinion of this Court be and the same is hereby affirmed. And that this cause be and the same is hereby remanded to the said circuit court, with directions to allow any person or persons not now parties and claiming title to any portion of the estate in controversy to become parties to the suit to present their claims and make due proof thereof, and for such further proceedings to be had therein, in conformity to the decree and opinion of this Court, as to law and justice shall appertain.
* Trustees -- Fox v. Mackreth, 2 Bro.C.C. 400; 4 Bro.P.C. (Tomlins') 258; Hall v. Noyes, 3 Bro.C.C. 483, and see 3 Ves.Jr. 748; Kellick v. Flexny, 4 Bro.C.C. 161; Whitcote v. Lawrence, 3 Ves.Jr. 740; Campbell v. Walker, 5 Ves.Jr. 678, and Whitackre v. Whitackre, Sel.Chan.Cases 13.
Remainders -- See Parks v. White, 11 Ves.Jr. 226.
Agents -- York Buildings Company v. Mackenzie, 8 Bro. P.C. 42; Lowther v. Lowther, 13 Ves.Jr. 95; see Watt v. Grove, 2 Sch. & Lef. 492; Whitcomb v. Minchin, 5 Madd. 91; Woodhouse v. Meredith, 1 Jac. & Walk. 204.
Commissioners of Bankrupts -- Ex Parte Bennet, 10 Ves.Jr. 381; Ex Parte Dumbell, Aug. 13, 1806, Mont., notes, 33, cited; Ex Parte Harrison, 1 Buck 17.
Assignees of Bankrupts -- Ex Parte Reynolds, 5 Ves.Jr. 707; Ex Parte Lacey, 6 Ves.Jr. 625; Ex Parte Bage, 4 Madd. 459; Ex Parte Badcock, 1 Mont. & Mac. 231.
Solicitors to the Commission -- Owen v. Foulkes, 6 Ves.Jr. 630, note b; Ex Parte Linwood; Ex Parte Churchill, 8 Ves.Jr. 343, cited; Ex Parte Bennet, 10 Ves.Jr. 381; Ex Parte Dumbell, Aug. 13, 1806, Mont., notes, cited; see 12 Ves.Jr. 372; 3 Mer. 200.
Auctioneers, creditors consulted as to mode of sale, or any persons who by their connection with, or concern in, the affairs have acquired a knowledge &c. -- See Ex Parte Hughes, 6 Ves.Jr. 617; Coles v. Trecothick, 9 Ves.Jr. 234; 1 Smith 233; Oliver v. Court, 8 Price 127.
Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.