Search Supreme Court Cases


U.S. Supreme Court

Labor Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 306 U.S. 292 (1939)

Labor Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.

No. 229

Argued January 11, 12, 1939

Decided February 27, 1939

306 U.S. 292


1. An order of the National Labor Relations Board requiring reinstatement of employees based on a finding that the employer, on a date specified, had refused to bargain with their Union, held invalid, the finding not being sustained by evidence. P. 306 U. S. 296.

2. The National Labor Relations Act does not compel the employer to seek out his employees and request their participation in negotiations for purposes of collective bargaining, and he may ignore or reject proposals for such bargaining which come from third persons not purporting to act with authority of his employees. P. 306 U. S. 297.

3. Section 10(e) of the Act in providing that the findings of the Board as to the facts, if supported by evidence, shall be conclusive, means evidence which is substantial -- that is, affording a substantial basis of fact from which the fact in issue can reasonably be inferred. P. 306 U. S. 299.

4. Substantial evidence is more than a scintilla, and must do more than create a suspicion of the existence of the fact to be established. It is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion, and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a jury, a refusal to direct a verdict when the

Page 306 U. S. 293

conclusion sought to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury. P. 306 U. S. 300

96 F.2d 948, affirmed.

Certiorari, 305 U.S. 583, to review a judgment refusing an application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of one of its orders.

Powered by Justia US Supreme Court Center: LABOR BOARD V. COLUMBIAN ENAMELING & STAMPING CO., 306 U. S. 292 (1939)

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.