Search Supreme Court Cases

TUTTLE V. HARRIS, 297 U. S. 225 (1936)

U.S. Supreme Court

Tuttle v. Harris, 297 U.S. 225 (1936)

Tuttle v. Harris

No. 428

Argued January 17, 1936

Decided February 3, 1936

297 U.S. 225


A mortgagee let into possession in foreclosure proceedings, under the law of Illinois, is not an equity receiver within the meaning of § 77B(a) of the Bankruptcy Act. Duparquet Huot & Moneuse Co. v. Evans, ante, . 297 U. S. 216. P. 297 U. S. 226.

78 F.2d 409 reversed.

Certiorari, 296 U.S. 567, to review a decree affirming one of the District Court, 9 F.Supp. 909, which denied a motion of the present petitioners to dismiss an application under § 77B(a) of the Bankruptcy Act.

Powered by Justia US Supreme Court Center: TUTTLE V. HARRIS, 297 U. S. 225 (1936)

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.