Search Supreme Court Cases

KANSAS CITY STAR CO. v. JULIAN - 215 U.S. 589 (1909)

U.S. Supreme Court

KANSAS CITY STAR CO. v. JULIAN, 215 U.S. 589 (1909)

215 U.S. 589

No. 85.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 6, 1909

Messrs. Isaac N. Watson, Hannis Taylor, Wash. Adams, and Frank Hagerman for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. John H. Atwood, O. H. Dean, and Ira Julian for defendant in error.

Per Curiam:

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Sayward v. Denny, 158 U.S. 180, 39 L. ed. 941, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 777; Mutual L. Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 307, 308 S., 47 L. ed. 480, 484, 485, 63 L.R.A. 33, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 375; State ex rel. Horton v. Bland, 186

Page 215 U.S. 589, 590

Mo. 701, 85 S. W. 561; F. G. Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler County, 166 U.S. 653, 41 L. ed. 1151, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 709.

The attention of the state supreme court was not called to any Federal question until in the petition for rehearing, and that was too late. Loeber v. Schroeder, 149 U.S. 580, 585, 37 S. L. ed. 856, 859, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 934, and cases.

The judgment rested on non Federal grounds broad enough to sustain it. Cincinnati Street R. Co. v. Snell, 193 U.S. 30, 48 L. ed. 604, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 319; Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas, 212 U.S. 322, 53 L. ed. 530, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 370.

Full Text of Opinion

Powered by Justia US Supreme Court Center: KANSAS CITY STAR CO. v. JULIAN - 215 U.S. 589 (1909)

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.